Glabbit wrote:Phoenix.
No.
Glabbit.
Plz.
Stahp.
Stop spouting bullshit.
*Start.
Please. It is not how logical debates work.
It's how internet debates work!
You are not contributing to science.
You are building a fort of fantasy and fallacy, using stubborn make-believe for mortar.
1: Citation needed.
2: You're not a poet.
3: So?
Your posts are riddled with examples of
ad hominem,
No, not really. I've rarely attacked the person and not the argument (even if I joke about the argument, that's not ad hominem). If so, quote.
However, here's what you're trying to say:
"IM SO OFENDED11!!1!!!!1!!!!!!!"
post hoc,[/quote]
1: No, for the most part it's not.
2: That's called cause and effect, shit like that exists. You can't just overgeneralize all of those as post hoc, that's being downright disingenious.
Not going to dignify this with a response.
Worse still, you are antagonising the exceedingly patient and reasonable Endoperez unduly, and that's just not cool.
Sorry if I'm fed up with idiocy recently, but people need to stop being idiots for once.
I oppose bullshit forced non-diversity
Stop. Right. There.
1: You're wrong. Totally wrong. In the most SJW way possible. GG isn't forcing non-diversity.
We're fighting forced diversity and overly zealous political correctness. The difference is, we don't care who's a gamer or not. No one knows who you are. No one cares either. We let people who are gamers be gamers, not force them out or force them in.
We aren't sitting here going "Everyone who isn't a white male catholic of at least 18 years of age, get out.", we're going: "Come in if you like, but don't change anything".
2: #notyourfuckingshield
3: "Muh diversity"
where games are not allowed to change because "gamers" would get their feelz hurt.
Hah, you misunderstand most gamers don't you? They'd be more pissed if the game wasn't permitted to exist. Look at Hatred.
"Mommy, he said I'm dead!"
"Mommy there isn't enough diversity!"
"#Notyourshield dear!"
"Those are sockpuppet accounts created by the patriarchy!"
Or:
"Mommy they don't want games to change!"
"Why do you want to change games dear?"
"Muh agenda and diversity!"
or:
"Mommy mommy, gamer shitlords attacked me for trying to change games!"
"Then be nicer, then they'll like you."
"But then I can't change their gaaammeeees!"
or
"Mommy gamers attacked meh!"
"C'mere dear..."
"I'm still strong right?"
"Yes you are, now go make videos about the patriarchy"
"Breaking the mold" is not "it needs to fit into the one, small mold right here".
That would require you to break the mold, you want to CHANGE the mold to accommodate new shapes, then force those shapes in since because... pickles.
That's kinda Twitter feminists' thing, going crazy for new things they haven't seen before. The more stereotypes it breaks, the more enthusiastic the reaction seems to be.
Your point? I'm confused.
Feminists and geek women I've seen are going crazy about a bodybuilder with pink hair, about a lesbian space rock square afro boxer warrior mom, sometimes they're going crazy about a muslim superhero Ms Marvel, or Batgirl, or short shape-shifting punks. "We're bored of the thin lithe half-naked pretty and cute girls, give us something different" isn't "fit it all into this mold".
No, it's shift the mold to accommodate new shit, even if most of the shapes don't want to be in that mold (and the rest are fine with the mold as it is). Not to mention that's a biased group of people.
It's not the age.
No, my point was that GG isn't mostly children. So.. okay.
c.
Yes, that is stupid. We already have rating systems and the only thing we might need to add to that is actually tell parents to use it. Who has been saying they should be banned because children might play them?[/spoiler]
In GWBW's case, no one. One person (who also said the people on the Hotline Miami forum were the cause for all the world's problems, good for everyone this person still has internet access) got it stuck on the front page with an age lock. That was combined with an ass ton of moral faggotry.
Glorious days.