randomness

zatoichi · Post by **zatoichi** » Thu Nov 29, 2007 6:34 pm

Grayswandir wrote:Because if you don't celebrate Thanksgiving, the day where we celebrate totally pwning the Native American n00bz...you obviously aren't American...everyone wants to be American...In America. The Native American's weren't American enough, so they got taught the ways of America and we give thanks for that every year...In America

Because we're all wearing American flag bandanas on our heads...In America.

And stop typing in whatever language you're typing in...you should be typing in American...the language everyone understands...In America.

I wrestle sharks and grizzly bears at the same time to attract the ladies so I can beat them with a club and drag them back to my pad...with my bling...In America.

Fear the homie...In America!!!

...What were we talking about again?

Sorry to ruin your extremely compelling argument, but I was talking about christmas, not thanksgiving. I like thanksgiving. It tastes good.

Grayswandir · Post by **Grayswandir** » Thu Nov 29, 2007 8:08 pm

zatoichi wrote:Sorry to ruin your extremely compelling argument, but I was talking about christmas, not thanksgiving. I like thanksgiving. It tastes good.

You obviously weren't talking in American then. People only understand American. And you're a liar...In America. You hate Thanksgiving, you're not doing it the American way...which is the only right way...In America.

Makrond · Post by **Makrond** » Fri Nov 30, 2007 12:53 am

Oh hot damn... I knew there was a reason why people always misunderstood me...

PORCHMONKEY = LAZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

.... Yup, Clerks II was the best movie ever.

EDIT: Here's something interesting for you... we have 12900 registered users...

ZOMG SPAM!

Spartan X · Post by **Spartan X** » Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:27 am

i have a new obsession...PASTA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Renegade_Turner · Post by **Renegade_Turner** » Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:02 pm

Incorrect.

Jay And Silent Bob Strike Back > Clerks 2.

Mallrats > Clerks 2.

Clerks > Clerks 2.

Ragdollmaster · Post by **Ragdollmaster** » Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:08 pm

Jay and Silent Bob? I don't know why i think this but weren't they the "prophets" from the movie Dogma?

zatoichi · Post by **zatoichi** » Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:31 pm

yes. Also, all those movies suck. The end. Anything by Akira Kurosawa >anything else.

Renegade_Turner · Post by **Renegade_Turner** » Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:41 pm

Yes, yes they were. Jay and Silent Bob were in Dogma with stupid-shit-face (Ben something?) and Matt Damon, who all also appeared in Jay And Silent Bob Strike Back as a matter of fact.

Makrond · Post by **Makrond** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:03 am

Actually, I agree with Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back...

And possibly Clerks...

Can't speak for Mallrats though.

As to AKira Kurosawa... Eh. Seven Samurai was good, but I'm not a huge fan of his other work.

Renegade_Turner · Post by **Renegade_Turner** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:26 am

zatoichi wrote:yes. Also, all those movies suck. The end. Anything by Akira Kurosawa >anything else.

I disagree.

zatoichi · Post by **zatoichi** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:14 pm

Well I disagree with your disagreement.

v-nix · Post by **v-nix** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:12 pm

i agree with the disagrement before the disagrement with the other disagreement

BunnyWithStick · Post by **BunnyWithStick** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 6:50 pm

You fail to confuse me, you obviously agree with the disagreer that disagreed with the other disagreer who disagreed with said disagreer's disagreement after that disagreement was posted, therefore this disagreer was disagreeing with a prior post of the other disagreer who disagreed with said disagreer's disagreement which seems to be about movies sucking.

Make sense now?

Renegade_Turner · Post by **Renegade_Turner** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:27 pm

...

zatoichi wrote:Well I disagree with your disagreement.

Well I disagree with that too.

BunnyWithStick · Post by **BunnyWithStick** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:28 pm

Now he's disagreeing with the disagreement of his disagreement of the other disagreer's statement which was not a disagreement. And the disagreement of a disagreement which was being disagreed with was a disagreement of a prior disagreement of said other disagreer's statement.