randomness

invertin · Post by **invertin** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:33 am

HEADPAIN!

Almost as much headpain as when my dad was playing a time travelling game and tried to explain the plot. @.@

Renegade_Turner · Post by **Renegade_Turner** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:36 am

It's not really confusing. It's just nonsensical. That doesn't automatically mean confusing...and I doubt your head hurts. One more quip like that though and you'll wish it wasn't hurting!

zatoichi · Post by **zatoichi** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:33 am

Renegade_Turner wrote:...

zatoichi wrote:Well I disagree with your disagreement.
Well I disagree with that too.

Hmm... I disagree.

wormguy · Post by **wormguy** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:22 pm

I'm going to pistol whip the next person who says "disagree".

Grayswandir · Post by **Grayswandir** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:09 pm

wormguy wrote:I'm going to pistol whip the next person who says "disagree".

MIND CRUSH!!!

...disagree.

v-nix · Post by **v-nix** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:00 pm

i cant tell who agrees with the movies sucking and who disagrees

wormguy · Post by **wormguy** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:36 pm

Two pistol whips, coming right up.

BunnyWithStick · Post by **BunnyWithStick** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:05 pm

It's obvious the most recent disagreers aren't actually agreeing or disagreeing with the other disagreers from before as they're just trying to make things funny as I am now. If you disagree, I disagree with your disagreement like the disagreers from earlier that disagreed with other disagreements which I can't even comprehend anymore…

Damn! This got so confusing I can't even make something that makes sense with all these umpteen negatives (Yes, the others did actually translate into a readable post if you figure out all those double negatives. And I am not translating it for you…)

Grayswandir · Post by **Grayswandir** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:19 pm

BunnyWithStick wrote:It's obvious the most recent disagreers aren't actually agreeing or disagreeing with the other disagreers from before as they're just trying to make things funny as I am now.

Naw, I just don't give a shit.

BunnyWithStick · Post by **BunnyWithStick** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:27 pm

I disagree disagree. If you don't get this most simple of double negatives, you suck.

Renegade_Turner · Post by **Renegade_Turner** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:43 pm

BunnyWithStick wrote:Yes, the others did actually translate into a readable post if you figure out all those double negatives.

And therefore also translated into poor English. You're not supposed to use double negatives.

v-nix · Post by **v-nix** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:57 pm

fish pie.

BunnyWithStick · Post by **BunnyWithStick** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:42 pm

Renegade_Turner wrote:
BunnyWithStick wrote:Yes, the others did actually translate into a readable post if you figure out all those double negatives.
And therefore also translated into poor English.

You don't believe me? Translate it yourself, I think you'll find it to be perfectly normal quality english.

For instance, "I agree" is perfectly normal english.

Grayswandir · Post by **Grayswandir** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:44 pm

BunnyWithStick wrote:For instance, "I agree" is perfectly normal english.

So is, "I like to rape little children." but you're not supposed to use that either.

Zantalos · Post by **Zantalos** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:39 pm

BunnyWithStick wrote:
Renegade_Turner wrote:
BunnyWithStick wrote:Yes, the others did actually translate into a readable post if you figure out all those double negatives.
And therefore also translated into poor English.
You don't believe me? Translate it yourself, I think you'll find it to be perfectly normal quality english.

For instance, "I agree" is perfectly normal english.

Ooh missed a little on that one.