For a 'pro'.rkn wrote:Linux is the answer...
Macs vs. PCs
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 7:08 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Contact:
Arguing on the Internet is like running in the Special Olympics...
Even if you win, you're still retarded
http://carcino.gen.nz/images/index.php/ ... 0/463c5922
Even if you win, you're still retarded
http://carcino.gen.nz/images/index.php/ ... 0/463c5922
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 9:17 pm
- Location: emeryville (yeah the small city)
- Contact:
Mac is the best!!!
PCs crash to much my, PowerBook hasn't crashed in sense i bought it almost 1 year ago...
my friends PC crashes every few days...
Do the math...
my friends PC crashes every few days...
Do the math...
-
- Bunnyface!
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:33 am
- Location: Swat, PA
- Contact:
Re: Mac is the best!!!
David's Powerbook crashes, QED.e2dolce wrote:PCs crash to much my, PowerBook hasn't crashed in sense i bought it almost 1 year ago...
my friends PC crashes every few days...
Do the math...
Wait, I thought this thread was (thankfully) dead... crap....
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:34 pm
- Location: Gebenstorf, Aargau, Switzerland, Europe, Earth, Sol, Universe 1
- Contact:
Re: Macs vs. PCs
Well... In One Way Macs are MUCH faster than PC's... PC=One Fast Dude taking One Sack of Datas at Time Mac=One Slower Dude taking 10 Sacks of Datas at a TimeJeff wrote:Macs are really bad... I am curious why people still use them considering how much faster, cheaper, etc. PCs are.
-
- NOT A FRIGGIN PROGRAMMER
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: South Carolina, United States
- Contact:
Anyone that has a monitor can now use Mac OSX 10.3.5 built in the hard drive with...Mac Mini!!! Yay! Now, will you all stop fighting for the two companys Apple and Microsoft in their never ending war. End the war on this forum! Yeah! Let them handle their own problems! Yeah! Kill Monty Microsoft! Yeah? Sorry, wrong guy. Now who's with me?! *cricket chirps* Forget you! BOOOOOOO!!! Lets destroy Microsoft! Yeah! Now who's with me?! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! ME! Eminem Rocks! This isn't an M&M convention! It's war! YEAH! (everyone in the crowd pulls out either a bazooka or an uzi) Destroy Microsoft! Yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Boom! BOOM! BOO...
Sorry, just fantasizing.
Sorry, just fantasizing.
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 10:06 pm
- Location: Lost in the 404 errors...
- Contact:
I made a simple "virus" for Mac
I once made a simple "virus" for Mac. Its a script file that you put on a xserve. (Easy to do in schools and offices that have all the acounts on the xserve.) Put it in an account, then eject the account, then "detonate" the script from terminal. Bam! 50 000 new folders created within a few minutes (unless it crashes) or Bam! 50 000 text files with customized content! or Bam! "top command being start 10 times every 5 seconds! (top uses about 9-10% of the cpu, so this one crashes quickly, unless it as lots and lots of ram. and a good processr, the it takes longer.Hamlover wrote:another plus is no viruses that are made for windoze can affect our beloved macs!
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 10:06 pm
- Location: Lost in the 404 errors...
- Contact:
Pcs vs Mac clocks
Macintosh computers get more done every clock cycle, therefore they have less clock cycles faster (less mhz). Pcs however get a hell of a lot less done every clock cycle. The reason they are so fast, is cuz they have to be. They are always behind the due date and have to rush to get there. Multitasking on PC will almost always result in crashing.
-
- NOT A FRIGGIN PROGRAMMER
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: South Carolina, United States
- Contact:
Re: Pcs vs Mac clocks
Duh! What did you say again? *reads the quote* Ok, I got ya, I'll pour hot soup in your eyes...wait! *reads the quote again* Oh! Right. That is very true...sorry, I was falling asleep while typing this...just...not...thinkain...straght. Sorry, I need to get to sleep...see you all in the 'morrow. To much slang.DudetheCreator wrote:Macintosh computers get more done every clock cycle, therefore they have less clock cycles faster (less mhz). Pcs however get a hell of a lot less done every clock cycle. The reason they are so fast, is cuz they have to be. They are always behind the due date and have to rush to get there. Multitasking on PC will almost always result in crashing.
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 10:06 pm
- Location: Lost in the 404 errors...
- Contact:
No offense but...
No offense but the chances that a PC crashes when doing multitasking is higher than a Mac. I can't even run applications like Donuts 3D or Milkshape without risk on my parents pc.
It's a matter of personal preference.
IMO, Linux for Stability, Mac for Productivity, PC's for solitare. But that's just me.
I just have one question for those that say Macs suck: Why are nearly ALL movies digitally edited/remastered with Macs? If PC's are so great howcome almost no one who needs an extremely high end machine uses them? And are we forgetting the Virginia Tech Supercomputer? A 5 million dollar collection of G5's that is the third fastest computer in the world, costing about a tenth of what the next one up costs. Running OS X, I should add.
IMO, Linux for Stability, Mac for Productivity, PC's for solitare. But that's just me.
I just have one question for those that say Macs suck: Why are nearly ALL movies digitally edited/remastered with Macs? If PC's are so great howcome almost no one who needs an extremely high end machine uses them? And are we forgetting the Virginia Tech Supercomputer? A 5 million dollar collection of G5's that is the third fastest computer in the world, costing about a tenth of what the next one up costs. Running OS X, I should add.
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 10:06 pm
- Location: Lost in the 404 errors...
- Contact: