Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees

Anything else
User avatar
adwuga
Posts: 2176
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:09 pm
Location: America... Fuck yeah.

Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees

Post by adwuga » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:39 pm

Ah, of course, because his brain grew too powerful for the third dimension, so the intelligent part was put in the fourth geometric dimension(not time). Interacting with a 3D keyboard would be incredibly difficult(imagine typing on a 2D keyboard(not popping out at you, because that requires 3D interaction; only 2D interaction is allowed)), thus, his 3D brain, which did not create the thesis(having only an IQ of 148), is the version typing, and thus refers to his intelligence as a separate entity(his thesis), while still being the 3D brains theory(my) since it was the version that did the typing. It seems so obvious in hindsight.

User avatar
Noxid
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 3:51 pm

Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees

Post by Noxid » Wed Nov 21, 2012 2:49 pm

I have reviewed your work on the subject of B-Trees and found the results to be quite insightful
however in my own research I have found that in emulating a 100-node overlay network, as opposed to emulating it in courseware, we would have seen improved results.
Continuing with this rationale, if we removed more FPUs from the KGB’s network to measure lazily signed algorithms’s lack of influence on the work of Russian computational biologist Andy Tanenbaum we might have gained additional insight into whether a framework’s read-write software architecture is even more important than RAM throughput when maximizing effective instruction rate. Similarly, we could have quadrupled the effective RAM throughput of our sensor-net testbed.
Lastly, I feel you should have added 300 3GB USB keys to the interposable overlay network to better understand the system. It should be noted, however, that configurations without this modification showed improved instruction rate.

User avatar
MadCatMax
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:16 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees

Post by MadCatMax » Wed Nov 21, 2012 5:16 pm

Noxid wrote:I have reviewed your work on the subject of B-Trees and found the results to be quite insightful
however in my own research I have found that in emulating a 100-node overlay network, as opposed to emulating it in courseware, we would have seen improved results.
Continuing with this rationale, if we removed more FPUs from the KGB’s network to measure lazily signed algorithms’s lack of influence on the work of Russian computational biologist Andy Tanenbaum we might have gained additional insight into whether a framework’s read-write software architecture is even more important than RAM throughput when maximizing effective instruction rate. Similarly, we could have quadrupled the effective RAM throughput of our sensor-net testbed.
Lastly, I feel you should have added 300 3GB USB keys to the interposable overlay network to better understand the system. It should be noted, however, that configurations without this modification showed improved instruction rate.
You raise some very important points, and i will take them in to account on my next report.

User avatar
adwuga
Posts: 2176
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:09 pm
Location: America... Fuck yeah.

Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees

Post by adwuga » Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:01 pm

Madcat where u go? the B-trees are dying!

User avatar
Jacktheawesome
Posts: 2406
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:06 am
Location: In Zulway's foot palace.
Contact:

Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees

Post by Jacktheawesome » Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:12 am

He's working on his next report.

User avatar
adwuga
Posts: 2176
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:09 pm
Location: America... Fuck yeah.

Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees

Post by adwuga » Sun Dec 09, 2012 12:23 am

Graded at a Doctorate/Post Graduate Level as a Thesis/Dissertation, this report received an A(91) with no grammar errors, 100% originality, and very good vocabulary and word choice.

This link may expire: http://www.paperrater.com/site/show_sub ... print=true

User avatar
Jacktheawesome
Posts: 2406
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:06 am
Location: In Zulway's foot palace.
Contact:

Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees

Post by Jacktheawesome » Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:11 am

Well he did say it was 100% proofable. I mean, just read his thesis.

User avatar
underthedeep
Posts: 1099
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: southern california
Contact:

Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees

Post by underthedeep » Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:23 am

i just read his thesis and boy let me tell ya, i am DEFINITELY now officially 100% proofed.


you can even read my thesis about it, if you'd like.

User avatar
adwuga
Posts: 2176
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:09 pm
Location: America... Fuck yeah.

Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees

Post by adwuga » Sun Dec 09, 2012 2:26 am

You'll have to post it if you want me to read it. I have to study for exams, so I don't have time to track you down, break into your house, and steal your thesis.

User avatar
Glabbit
Posts: 4917
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:38 am
Location: A mile away, with your shoes!

Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees

Post by Glabbit » Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:57 am

I too suffer this 100% proofable conundrum.
I could write you a thesis about it but I don't have time because of my B-Tree exams.

User avatar
MadCatMax
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:16 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees

Post by MadCatMax » Sun Dec 16, 2012 1:27 pm

adwuga wrote:Graded at a Doctorate/Post Graduate Level as a Thesis/Dissertation, this report received an A(91) with no grammar errors, 100% originality, and very good vocabulary and word choice.

This link may expire: http://www.paperrater.com/site/show_sub ... print=true
Do not mock me for my controversial views, the site that you used to graded my report only gave me a 91 percent.
THAT SOME CLASS A BULLSHIT
Everyone that has a brain know that should have got a 100 percent because my Theory for
B-Trees is 100 percent proofable just read his thesis

User avatar
MadCatMax
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:16 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees

Post by MadCatMax » Sun Dec 16, 2012 1:29 pm

adwuga wrote:Madcat where u go? the B-trees are dying!
I am busy with school and exams, but am working on a movie reveiw that i will post soon.


Can you water the B-Trees for me when am gone

User avatar
adwuga
Posts: 2176
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:09 pm
Location: America... Fuck yeah.

Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees

Post by adwuga » Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:27 pm

Sure thing bro. Should I use any special kind of water? Like tritiated water?
MadCatMax wrote:Everyone that has a brain know that should have got a 100 percent
The site doesn't have a brain. So yeah, basically.

User avatar
Retarded Username
Posts: 491
Joined: Tue May 08, 2012 6:00 am
Location: Going over the Trump wall

Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees

Post by Retarded Username » Wed Dec 26, 2012 9:18 pm

Someone can explain me what is this thesi- I mean thread, about?

User avatar
Jacktheawesome
Posts: 2406
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:06 am
Location: In Zulway's foot palace.
Contact:

Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees

Post by Jacktheawesome » Wed Dec 26, 2012 9:30 pm

Well, just read his thesis. It's 100% proofable.

Locked