Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees
Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees
Ah, of course, because his brain grew too powerful for the third dimension, so the intelligent part was put in the fourth geometric dimension(not time). Interacting with a 3D keyboard would be incredibly difficult(imagine typing on a 2D keyboard(not popping out at you, because that requires 3D interaction; only 2D interaction is allowed)), thus, his 3D brain, which did not create the thesis(having only an IQ of 148), is the version typing, and thus refers to his intelligence as a separate entity(his thesis), while still being the 3D brains theory(my) since it was the version that did the typing. It seems so obvious in hindsight.
Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees
I have reviewed your work on the subject of B-Trees and found the results to be quite insightful
however in my own research I have found that in emulating a 100-node overlay network, as opposed to emulating it in courseware, we would have seen improved results.
Continuing with this rationale, if we removed more FPUs from the KGB’s network to measure lazily signed algorithms’s lack of influence on the work of Russian computational biologist Andy Tanenbaum we might have gained additional insight into whether a framework’s read-write software architecture is even more important than RAM throughput when maximizing effective instruction rate. Similarly, we could have quadrupled the effective RAM throughput of our sensor-net testbed.
Lastly, I feel you should have added 300 3GB USB keys to the interposable overlay network to better understand the system. It should be noted, however, that configurations without this modification showed improved instruction rate.
however in my own research I have found that in emulating a 100-node overlay network, as opposed to emulating it in courseware, we would have seen improved results.
Continuing with this rationale, if we removed more FPUs from the KGB’s network to measure lazily signed algorithms’s lack of influence on the work of Russian computational biologist Andy Tanenbaum we might have gained additional insight into whether a framework’s read-write software architecture is even more important than RAM throughput when maximizing effective instruction rate. Similarly, we could have quadrupled the effective RAM throughput of our sensor-net testbed.
Lastly, I feel you should have added 300 3GB USB keys to the interposable overlay network to better understand the system. It should be noted, however, that configurations without this modification showed improved instruction rate.
Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees
You raise some very important points, and i will take them in to account on my next report.Noxid wrote:I have reviewed your work on the subject of B-Trees and found the results to be quite insightful
however in my own research I have found that in emulating a 100-node overlay network, as opposed to emulating it in courseware, we would have seen improved results.
Continuing with this rationale, if we removed more FPUs from the KGB’s network to measure lazily signed algorithms’s lack of influence on the work of Russian computational biologist Andy Tanenbaum we might have gained additional insight into whether a framework’s read-write software architecture is even more important than RAM throughput when maximizing effective instruction rate. Similarly, we could have quadrupled the effective RAM throughput of our sensor-net testbed.
Lastly, I feel you should have added 300 3GB USB keys to the interposable overlay network to better understand the system. It should be noted, however, that configurations without this modification showed improved instruction rate.
Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees
Madcat where u go? the B-trees are dying!
-
- Posts: 2406
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:06 am
- Location: In Zulway's foot palace.
- Contact:
Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees
He's working on his next report.
Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees
Graded at a Doctorate/Post Graduate Level as a Thesis/Dissertation, this report received an A(91) with no grammar errors, 100% originality, and very good vocabulary and word choice.
This link may expire: http://www.paperrater.com/site/show_sub ... print=true
This link may expire: http://www.paperrater.com/site/show_sub ... print=true
-
- Posts: 2406
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:06 am
- Location: In Zulway's foot palace.
- Contact:
Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees
Well he did say it was 100% proofable. I mean, just read his thesis.
-
- Posts: 1099
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:18 pm
- Location: southern california
- Contact:
Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees
i just read his thesis and boy let me tell ya, i am DEFINITELY now officially 100% proofed.
you can even read my thesis about it, if you'd like.
you can even read my thesis about it, if you'd like.
Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees
You'll have to post it if you want me to read it. I have to study for exams, so I don't have time to track you down, break into your house, and steal your thesis.
Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees
I too suffer this 100% proofable conundrum.
I could write you a thesis about it but I don't have time because of my B-Tree exams.
I could write you a thesis about it but I don't have time because of my B-Tree exams.
Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees
Do not mock me for my controversial views, the site that you used to graded my report only gave me a 91 percent.adwuga wrote:Graded at a Doctorate/Post Graduate Level as a Thesis/Dissertation, this report received an A(91) with no grammar errors, 100% originality, and very good vocabulary and word choice.
This link may expire: http://www.paperrater.com/site/show_sub ... print=true
THAT SOME CLASS A BULLSHIT
Everyone that has a brain know that should have got a 100 percent because my Theory for
B-Trees is 100 percent proofable just read his thesis
Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees
I am busy with school and exams, but am working on a movie reveiw that i will post soon.adwuga wrote:Madcat where u go? the B-trees are dying!
Can you water the B-Trees for me when am gone
Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees
Sure thing bro. Should I use any special kind of water? Like tritiated water?
The site doesn't have a brain. So yeah, basically.MadCatMax wrote:Everyone that has a brain know that should have got a 100 percent
-
- Posts: 491
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2012 6:00 am
- Location: Going over the Trump wall
Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees
Someone can explain me what is this thesi- I mean thread, about?
-
- Posts: 2406
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:06 am
- Location: In Zulway's foot palace.
- Contact:
Re: Collaborative, Certifiable Theory for B-Trees
Well, just read his thesis. It's 100% proofable.