If the output adjusts itself based on any information then that information becomes the input.Freshbite wrote:the output adjusts itself to a new "prediction" based on the new circumstance that arrived since its last output.
Thus Input->Output.
To put an end to this "F or B" argument, the priciple didn't apply to human input, it applyed to very specific scientific events that are inanimate and can't be dicks like humans to try and prove people wrong.
They experiment they used to prove this was quantum entanglement. Which follows kind of a "schrodinger's law" that two partices are not actually "entangled" until someone trys to measure them. They were saying in the article that the particles were "entangled" before anyone looked at them.
Which honestly begs the question as to how they knew anything about them before they actually looked that them.