That's a completely different situation. These people are considered eye witnesses and there still needs to a proper investigation before anything happens. They can't just contact a newspaper or post on social media sites that neighbour Jones has tried to drown them. They have tell that to the police and tell the story at court.Phoenixwarrior141 wrote:People who have survived murders have indicted other people despite evidence to contrary.EPR89 wrote: See the edit I wrote to my post above. They can think whatever they want. As soon as they write or say that he did it without having any proof it becomes libel/slander.
Absolutely no discussion. Trying to hurt someone's reputation without something to back it up is illegal and one of the lowest moves possible in such a situation.
If no one is in a position to claim anything, why the hell did bring all this up in the first place?Which is what I said in my weird pants-on-head-without-arms retarded way.There doesn't have to be a confirmation that it was a lie. What sort of ass-backwards thinking is that?
Before anyone can claim something like that there needs to be a confirmation that it is actually true.
Since there is no proof whether the claim was false, no one is in the position to say anything. Especially given Brianna's supposed track record on the issue (Proof needed). And GamerGate's tendency to jump the gun on EVERYTHING.
I don't even see the connection between that stupid story and her history of depression. The way this looks to me is that you really, really, really wanted to discredit her story for some reason because ou thought that she was one of your dreaded feminazis. The problem is that the thing you brought up has absolutely nothing to do with the topic people were talking about.
I don't know if this is clear to you, but this is a serious low blow. Targeting her person directly like that, without any relevance to the issue. Why did you feel the need to do this?