Page 4 of 8

Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 8:20 pm
by Zantalos
Renegade_Turner wrote:Still does not excuse arrogance. Tell him that if he keeps breaching the rules then he'll be banned, but don't mock him.

Christ, you guys have given me warnings for less.
I dunno, maybe... I think making a joke for simple matters is better than slamming the law down.


I have the same opinion as Chazfox, there was nothing really wrong here. This wasn't what I call harsh.

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 10:33 am
by wormguy
Personally, I don't mind leetspeak unless it takes me longer to read it than a normally spelled sentence. When I have to break out my brain's 1337-decoder to read a sentence, that gets annoying.

Unfortunately, 99% of leetspeak is harder to read than normal words.

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 11:24 am
by Crill3
It always takes longer, and it serves no purpose.
Why are you talking about "leetspeak" anyway?
That's not what vnix or whatever person did.

What's the origin of "txt-talk" anyway?

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 12:00 pm
by rudel_ic
Short messages.

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 8:38 pm
by BunnyWithStick
Translation of what rudel_ic wrote:Text messages.
At least that's how it's always said around here.

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 11:43 pm
by Colicedus
What's the origin of "txt-talk" anyway?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leetspeak

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 11:54 pm
by BunnyWithStick
There is a severe lack of relevance in that. We're talking about txt-talk, not leetspeak.

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 12:00 am
by Renegade_Turner
David wrote:It is a bit ironic to make accusations of arrogance when most of your sentences are in imperative form. I don't really have time to argue about this... back to work :)
I wasn't trying to give orders. I was providing an example of what I think you should have done. If, however, giving my opinion on something makes me the bad guy, so be it.

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 2:29 am
by Colicedus

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 5:10 am
by Ultimatum479
Renegade, he has no grasp of some of the most basic grammatical rules of English and is an incompetent speller. He's beneath us all. Why do you care about him?

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 5:41 am
by invertin
Your calling V-nix beneath you? Have you seen his art? Or his pivot animations? Or even some of his story ideas? The only flaw of V-nix is the typing. But that is just because this is the first forum that I know of that he's been on.

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 5:50 am
by BunnyWithStick
Either that or he's had a cellphone nearly all his life. Or both.

I agree that he has serious talent. This is proof that txt-talk and it's associated lack of grammatical comprehensibility makes people seem less than what they are.

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 5:53 am
by ChazFox
invertin wrote:Your calling V-nix beneath you? Have you seen his art? Or his pivot animations? Or even some of his story ideas? The only flaw of V-nix is the typing. But that is just because this is the first forum that I know of that he's been on.
Well I haven't seen his art/pivots/story ideas but now you have me interested :) and again, V-nix has improved his spelling (a little mistake here and there but nothing like what he used to talk like, so that's good with me ^^) so I'm wondering why the hell we're still arguing about his spelling. Let him state his cause and let the admins hear him out, I say.

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 5:59 am
by Colicedus
:)

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 6:07 am
by BunnyWithStick
Sorry for the near double post, but I forgot to say that I didn't know that txt-talk was actually a real term.

*stops honing his skills for 20 years*

Hooray for psychism! Um… Hooray for psychicism! Er… Hooray for psy-ness! Hooray for…