ghosts and the paranormal
-
- Gramps, Jr.
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:14 am
- Location: New Zealand
If you were going back in time and make a new timeline, it would not matter
to you that the original ever existed.
You would never be able to go back.
To yourself and everyone else, it would still all seem like one timeline.
And doesn't that happen all the time, then?
As time goes, let's call it forward, we all keep up with it, thereby traveling in
time.
Also, what is a more precise definition of "timeline"?
to you that the original ever existed.
You would never be able to go back.
To yourself and everyone else, it would still all seem like one timeline.
And doesn't that happen all the time, then?
As time goes, let's call it forward, we all keep up with it, thereby traveling in
time.
Also, what is a more precise definition of "timeline"?
-
- Short end of the stick
- Posts: 3655
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 12:37 am
- Location: Robbing the cradle.
See, someone who gets what I'm talkin' 'bout.Crill3 wrote:If you were going back in time and make a new timeline, it would not matter
to you that the original ever existed.
You would never be able to go back.
To yourself and everyone else, it would still all seem like one timeline.
And doesn't that happen all the time, then?
As time goes, let's call it forward, we all keep up with it, thereby traveling in
time.
Also, what is a more precise definition of "timeline"?
are you guys saying you wont be able to change anything by going back in time because what ever you want to do would have already happenedGrayswandir wrote:See, someone who gets what I'm talkin' 'bout.Crill3 wrote:If you were going back in time and make a new timeline, it would not matter
to you that the original ever existed.
You would never be able to go back.
To yourself and everyone else, it would still all seem like one timeline.
And doesn't that happen all the time, then?
As time goes, let's call it forward, we all keep up with it, thereby traveling in
time.
Also, what is a more precise definition of "timeline"?
yeh i thought you did,
-
- Gramps, Jr.
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:14 am
- Location: New Zealand
Well, if the only thing to suggest time travel is impossible is that what you want to do via time travel has already happened because you already went back in time, that creates a rather obvious paradox involving the fact that you can't time travel in the first place.
Oh well, it's obvious there is no "Time" anyway, so… *runs away screaming*
Oh well, it's obvious there is no "Time" anyway, so… *runs away screaming*
-
- Gramps, Jr.
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:14 am
- Location: New Zealand
-
- Short end of the stick
- Posts: 3655
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 12:37 am
- Location: Robbing the cradle.
-
- forom-muppat-yoda
- Posts: 2592
- Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 4:57 am
- Location: Where ever your mind takes you
Why eat a baby when you can eat a placenta, Like Tom Cruise?
http://cruiseeatsplacenta.ytmnd.com/
http://cruiseeatsplacenta.ytmnd.com/