Hats inside schools.....and anywhere

Anything else

Do you think that wearing hats inside is rude?

Yea, DOWN WITH THE HATS
4
24%
No, hats are cool with me
13
76%
 
Total votes: 17

User avatar
nerodx
confused couch potato
Posts: 987
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Cleveland (We're not Detroit!)
Contact:

Post by nerodx » Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:52 pm

David wrote:3) Because hats primarily exist to protect your head outside, wearing one inside gives the impression that you don't really want to be there.
....i dont see where your going with this one... hats are fun and help you express yourself. we dont have a dress code really, just no HATS...no spandex? and girls can't wear pants that dont go past their fingertips....i hate that damn rule...so glad no one ever listens....sexy time

David
Project Leader
Posts: 1995
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 10:45 pm
Contact:

Post by David » Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:45 pm

You're right, that is a pretty weak point.

User avatar
Blorx
NOT A FRIGGIN PROGRAMMER
Posts: 3272
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: South Carolina, United States
Contact:

Post by Blorx » Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:53 pm

Crill3 wrote:If you want your hat on, have it on.
It is not rude or offensive to anyone, some people just pretend it is,
because it's tradition for whatever stupid reason.
I don't want to have anything on my head when I'm in school,
but if I wanted to, they would have to throw me out.
I question the teachers everytime I see this rule enforced,
and they have no argument against indoor hats/hoods, and they never will.

If they implemented school uniform here, I would ignore that also.

Edit: I can't write.
I question teachers anyways xD

but yeah, the rule is gay and I'm prolly gonna wear a hat tomorrow just cuz I can...and cuz of this bulletin...

David
Project Leader
Posts: 1995
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 10:45 pm
Contact:

Post by David » Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:57 pm

I think it would only be gay if you were restricted to hats that were fabulous.

wormguy
Posts: 685
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 9:59 am
Contact:

Post by wormguy » Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:21 pm

David wrote:I think it would only be gay if you were restricted to hats that were fabulous.
That, sir, is a glorious quote. Let me see if I can dig up an internet or two to award you.

zatoichi
Posts: 577
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:32 pm
Location: Ithaca NY
Contact:

Post by zatoichi » Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:07 pm

wormguy wrote:
David wrote:I think it would only be gay if you were restricted to hats that were fabulous.
That, sir, is a glorious quote. Let me see if I can dig up an internet or two to award you.
Quoted for truth.

User avatar
Renegade_Turner
Gramps
Posts: 6942
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am

Post by Renegade_Turner » Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:27 pm

David wrote:I think it would only be gay if you were restricted to hats that were fabulous.
You forgot the "absolutely" before "fabulous". Not to worry, dahling, it's alright. Tee-hee. ^_^

User avatar
Count Roland
Posts: 2937
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:15 pm
Location: Galapagos Islands, rodeoin some turtles.
Contact:

Post by Count Roland » Sat Oct 13, 2007 5:26 am

BunnyWithStick wrote:What the hell is up with what people find rude these days?

People just try to think of new random rules that don't, shouldn't, and should never cause any problems or offense to people.

Come on, a hat is a hat. What's next, wearing pants inside is considered rude?
um.. its not just these days back in "the old days" i.e. victorian era it was considered rude for men to wear hats indoors (although women could)
and it was considered very rude to say pants or legs. we're lucky we live in a culture with even this much freedom of expression

User avatar
BunnyWithStick
Gramps, Jr.
Posts: 4297
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:14 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by BunnyWithStick » Sat Oct 13, 2007 6:47 am

Count Roland wrote:…and it was considered very rude to say pants or legs.
That's it, Hell has officially merged with this plane of existance.

*whacks self with baseball bat*

User avatar
nerodx
confused couch potato
Posts: 987
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Cleveland (We're not Detroit!)
Contact:

Post by nerodx » Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:38 pm

...im staying out of this one except for ZOMG SAW IV

User avatar
Count Roland
Posts: 2937
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:15 pm
Location: Galapagos Islands, rodeoin some turtles.
Contact:

Post by Count Roland » Tue Oct 23, 2007 4:27 pm

Count Roland wrote:
BunnyWithStick wrote:What the hell is up with what people find rude these days?

People just try to think of new random rules that don't, shouldn't, and should never cause any problems or offense to people.

Come on, a hat is a hat. What's next, wearing pants inside is considered rude?
um.. its not just these days back in "the old days" i.e. victorian era it was considered rude for men to wear hats indoors (although women could)
and it was considered very rude to say pants or legs. we're lucky we live in a culture with even this much freedom of expression
why did i even post here that was pretty dumb of me...

User avatar
v-nix
gr8 notebook artist
Posts: 603
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:21 pm
Contact:

Post by v-nix » Tue Oct 23, 2007 4:32 pm

nerodx wrote:...im staying out of this one except for ZOMG SAW IV
meh, i found that out a few months ago, on my media guide on media player

User avatar
Jarkava
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: A place where the government cant find me

Post by Jarkava » Fri Oct 26, 2007 11:14 am

BunnyWithStick wrote:Come on, a hat is a hat. What's next, wearing pants inside is considered rude?
Only for girls it is . . . wait. . . yeah only for girls

User avatar
Renegade_Turner
Gramps
Posts: 6942
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am

Post by Renegade_Turner » Fri Oct 26, 2007 11:16 am

No it's not.

User avatar
nerodx
confused couch potato
Posts: 987
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Cleveland (We're not Detroit!)
Contact:

Post by nerodx » Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:25 pm

please hold your pimpiness until the designated time...thank you

Post Reply