Split: random girl talk from obligatory introduction thread

Anything else
User avatar
Glabbit
Posts: 4917
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:38 am
Location: A mile away, with your shoes!

Re: obligatory introduction thread

Post by Glabbit » Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:59 am

Knowing of yours faults means you're already halfway to bettering them.

User avatar
Renegade_Turner
Gramps
Posts: 6942
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am

Re: obligatory introduction thread

Post by Renegade_Turner » Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:39 pm

Wow, someone posts a big long post which is trying to flame me, and I'm the criminal.

I already said I wouldn't respond to him.

As I said, my word some are petty.

User avatar
Chainsaw man
Posts: 1492
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 6:13 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: obligatory introduction thread

Post by Chainsaw man » Fri Nov 14, 2008 3:09 pm

Quite allot of shit thats comming out of some one who said:
Renegade_Turner wrote:This is the last I'll say to you about this.
Damnit, dont you know when to shut up? :roll:
Glabbit wrote:Knowing of yours faults means you're already halfway to bettering them.
Though is fusyness a bad thing? Admitivly Shallowness can be a cripling thing.
You must learn to take your vices and take them forward to virtue, and those that you can not eather keep them to make yourself an interesting person, or drop them as they do not serve you.
Agreed or Disagreed?

User avatar
Renegade_Turner
Gramps
Posts: 6942
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am

Re: obligatory introduction thread

Post by Renegade_Turner » Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:07 pm

It's funny how people think I'm talking to them when I'm clearly not. Quite amusing indeed. Some people don't know when to stop trying to flame people. Maybe something they should work on.

So, that monetary liquidity crisis eh? Ain't that something!

User avatar
Glabbit
Posts: 4917
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:38 am
Location: A mile away, with your shoes!

Re: obligatory introduction thread

Post by Glabbit » Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:29 am

Shut it, the both of you.
You're starting to get immature with this.
Resolve or dissolve, but don't fuel.

User avatar
Viking Zippy
Wooter
Posts: 1215
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 5:56 pm
Location: Milky Way
Contact:

Re: obligatory introduction thread

Post by Viking Zippy » Sat Nov 15, 2008 10:07 am

Saying you're not responding to someone when they can clearly 'hear' you defeats the purpose of not responding in the first place.

User avatar
Blorx
NOT A FRIGGIN PROGRAMMER
Posts: 3272
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: South Carolina, United States
Contact:

Re: obligatory introduction thread

Post by Blorx » Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:32 pm

Glabbit wrote:Shut it, the both of you.
You're starting to get immature with this.
Resolve or dissolve, but don't fuel.
GLABBIT!!!
GODDAMNIT!
GET BACK HERE WITH MY SHOES!
I GOT SCHOOLLLLL!

User avatar
Count Roland
Posts: 2936
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:15 pm
Location: Galapagos Islands, rodeoin some turtles.
Contact:

Re: obligatory introduction thread

Post by Count Roland » Sun Nov 16, 2008 3:38 am

if you're going to insult someone walk a mile in their shoes, that way you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

User avatar
Glabbit
Posts: 4917
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:38 am
Location: A mile away, with your shoes!

Re: obligatory introduction thread

Post by Glabbit » Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:11 am

Been there, done that, and found insulting still to be irrational.

User avatar
Renegade_Turner
Gramps
Posts: 6942
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am

Re: obligatory introduction thread

Post by Renegade_Turner » Sun Nov 16, 2008 1:12 pm

Glabbit wrote:Shut it, the both of you.
You're starting to get immature with this.
Resolve or dissolve, but don't fuel.
I'm not sure I understand what you're talking about. I was asking people who continue pointless arguments to stop arguing and flaming when it's already finished. Forgive me for appealing to reason.

User avatar
Glabbit
Posts: 4917
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:38 am
Location: A mile away, with your shoes!

Re: obligatory introduction thread

Post by Glabbit » Sun Nov 16, 2008 1:29 pm

I'll forgive you for appealing to reason once you do so.
Talking around someone has no honour or positive effect.
I have no more to say on the subject, and thus I will not.

User avatar
Chainsaw man
Posts: 1492
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 6:13 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: obligatory introduction thread

Post by Chainsaw man » Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:59 pm

Renegade_Turner wrote:
Glabbit wrote:Shut it, the both of you.
You're starting to get immature with this.
Resolve or dissolve, but don't fuel.
I'm not sure I understand what you're talking about. I was asking people who continue pointless arguments to stop arguing and flaming when it's already finished. Forgive me for appealing to reason.
You were not... :roll:
Glabbit wrote:I'll forgive you for appealing to reason once you do so.
Talking around someone has no honour or positive effect.
I have no more to say on the subject, and thus I will not.
are you sure?

User avatar
Renegade_Turner
Gramps
Posts: 6942
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am

Re: obligatory introduction thread

Post by Renegade_Turner » Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:22 pm

Glabbit wrote:I'll forgive you for appealing to reason once you do so.
Talking around someone has no honour or positive effect.
I have no more to say on the subject, and thus I will not.
Thanks Glabbit, at least some people on here are nice. ^_^

joycie
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: homeless, CA

Re: Split: random girl talk from obligatory introduction thread

Post by joycie » Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:06 pm

:wink:

User avatar
Makrond
Posts: 498
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:34 pm

Re: Split: random girl talk from obligatory introduction thread

Post by Makrond » Tue Nov 18, 2008 6:09 pm

Man, you people are weird... there's a girl on the forum and you're busy arguing about who needs to shut up? :P

Seriously, though? I don't see why it's a big deal - or even why it's a deal at all. Women, in case you haven't noticed, are everywhere in society; it's just that in some places they're a little rarer than others.

Also, does anyone else dislike referring to them as 'females'?

Post Reply