Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 3:37 pm
Some guy screws over nature by shooting a rabbit (Hunting is a moral dilemna, but he took the corpse with him, so it's not like he did it for fun.), running over some weird animal (he didn't do that on purpose!) polluting the water (which, according to the map, was far ahead of him instead of behind as the animation showed, so it's contradictory as well) so the american government or something decide to punish him (HE'S DONE NOTHING WRONG INTENTIONALLY EXCEPT GETTING PISSED OFF AT A TREE FALLING IN THE ROAD WHICH IS JUST A NORMAL REACTION) by shooting out his brakes so that he dies in a car crash, then NUKING HIMEndoperez wrote:The story wasn't idiotic,
BECAUSE NUKES ARE GOOD FOR THE ENVIRONMENT
The animation itself wasn't bad, the drawings were bad, but I've seen worse on actual TV.
The other I kind of understood. As far as I can tell, someone is looking for their friend in a forest, finds him on the ground (unconcious or dead or something), so a bigger kid throws him to the ground and smashes his head in with a giant stick. I'm assuming the bigger kid is evil or something, but I don't know.
I voted for Untadaike. Blind Pew's was good, but the story made me angry, while Untadaike's was good but the story made little sense, but I feel like it was taken out of some context rather than just being nonsensical.
So there.