Ok, but what if the chances are actually greater? That statement holds just as much logic as saying there could be less than a 1.4x10^34 to 1 chance. You are correct in that we don't know enough to state specifically one way or the other that there is life on other planets, but by that logic, we can't state anything until we actually find life, which sort of defeats the purpose of speculation and scientific study.Ragdollmaster wrote:TBC: What if they are actually less than 14,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 to one? You can't calculate what you don't really know. Too many variables to just boil it down to "Out of so many planets, at least ONE will eventually host life randomly"; again, "We can only really speculate about this based on partial information when we don't have the full picture."
If I said there was a 99.9% chance of life, it doesn't mean there is, but there's a pretty damn good chance of it. Just because we don't have all of the facts doesn't mean we can't give a speculation.
We have discovered habitable planets in the visible universe. Plenty of them in fact, over 200 billion billion. I'd say that then chances are fairly high if there are that many habitable planets in our visible universe, and that's not even counting the rest of the universe.
http://www.livescience.com/space/090219 ... -life.html
And back in 2007:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... lanet.html