Wolfire Games Forums

LMFAO

"Bella does not seem to care that Jacob the Pedophile Date Rapist Werewolf is babysitting the Little Loch Ness Monster Vampire Baby from Hell."

God that was the greatest internet page ever lol.

Oh and I liked 28 Weeks Later more than 28 Days Later.

Compared to other Vampire Movies, it is a big flaming pile of shitty, bloody piles on a platur.
I admit, I acualy saw it because it was a vampire flic, and my mates were going, It suxed.
It was Tourcher. It had no smut, blood, or removal of a beating heart. We had a fucking "Vegaterian" Vampire for god sake! He stuck to Animals blood insead, cause hes VEE-gan! How fucking usless, you could have put a Worthingtons Food advertisemnt refferance in that sceen!

Hells bells, Vampires are evil perverson of the living world, bending the walls of reality and the planes of existance to suite them. There weakness is there need for blood. There should have been blood in it, I wanted to see spontanious corps explosions. I just hope Lesbian Vampire Killers is a better movie.

Renegade_Turner wrote:Yeah but Underworld sucked dick.

Which one?

1. Too many people take these books seriously.
2. Taken together, the series is the 'Manos: The Hands of Fate' of literature.
3. Either because they love comedy or hate themselves, the winners of this week's Topics Page Contest read every word of the entire series.

DAMN STRAIGHT. I f*cking hate Twilight for exactly these reasons.
This article PERFECTLY describes the twilight series.

Tried watching that Lesbian Vampire Killers thing with my friend a few weeks ago, lol. We only made it through like 5 minutes before she turned it to Amityville Horror instead. I didn't really like those 5 minutes though, it seemed like, idk how to describe it, like a movie that tries to be serious about a silly subject. I can't remember, good luck with that though, can't be as bad as Twilight.

Underworld failed because it took an unoriginal plot- folklore and mythology have always pitted vampires against werewolves, or 'lycans' as they've been called for the fictitious condition 'Lycanthropy' which turns a human into a werewolf- and then couldn't make a decent movie out of it. Same old same old isn't always bad if there's a good story behind it, but it was basically "LOL CLAN WARS LES GO KEEL THE OTHER GUISE HUR HUR HUR"

True, but still Underworld > Twilight.

Stephanie Meier is to modern literature as Adolf Hitler was to Ger- no wait, Europe.

1. Who cares? We all know what she is from reading that page. =P
2. At the very least, Interview with the Vampire > Twilight. I loved the IwtV book. Then The Vampire Lestat kinda ruined it. *shrugs*

1: Irrelevant as the people who care about Stephanie Meyer are the same breed of personality lacking retards who adore people such as Miley Cyrus and therefore their opinions and displays of adoration hold no real qualitative value.
2: Interview With The Vampire is an awesome vampire film adaptation. Moreso than I Am Legend, which ended up with a slightly alternated storyline and horrible CGI effects for its release period.

1: I know, right? Like, there's no way there's anyone similar to me alive.
2: I liked I am Legend, but it fell short of the original. Kind of like Watchmen when it got translated into a movie.