Why exactly do you want one if it's only 'good' I can see maybe buying a video game just to try it out, but you'd really spend $500-$850 just to get something "good"?Armored Wolf wrote:Since Apple released a good product, but not an amazing one, everybody is like "Apple is lame. However, I do in fact want one, even if you don't.Uberbeard wrote:Kotaku ran a good anti-iPad article lately, dismissing it's weak claims to innovation and making the point that, because of how big Apple are, it's actually standing in the way of forward progress. Much agree.
iPad
-
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 11:01 am
- Location: Lost in the Alps.
Re: iPad
-
- Gramps
- Posts: 6942
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am
Re: iPad
I have to say I agree with The Big Cheese and Uberbeard. Pretty ridiculous price tag.
However, it does look kind of neat. Even if it's not "innovative", which is a term some people seem to cream their pants over, I wouldn't say no to an iPad...if it's free.
However, it does look kind of neat. Even if it's not "innovative", which is a term some people seem to cream their pants over, I wouldn't say no to an iPad...if it's free.
-
- Posts: 1267
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:35 am
- Location: In Renegade_Turner's brain
Re: iPad
You will find no other tablet for that price that's not a piece of crap.Renegade_Turner wrote:I have to say I agree with The Big Cheese and Uberbeard. Pretty ridiculous price tag.
However, it does look kind of neat. Even if it's not "innovative", which is a term some people seem to cream their pants over, I wouldn't say no to an iPad...if it's free.
-
- Gramps
- Posts: 6942
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am
Re: iPad
That's ridiculous, if I was buying medication for 500 dollars I'd expect it to at least be good quality. =[
-
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:07 pm
- Location: Behind the fuzzy wall of beard
- Contact:
Re: iPad
But it's pappy futurism, it doesn't bother me when Apple release a normal update to their iPods or MacBooks but when they create a relative media blackout on a product (to create buzz) and push it out as innovative, it's pisses me off a little bit. I care about digital media because it's what I want to go into, so when I see a company that made efforts to place itself at the front of the development community release a convergance of old media and shopping. It sidelines innovation because, when Apple does something, everyone copies, and not often very well. It also works as a business model for future products, and it's likely to be successful, because people buy into the Apple ecology.Armored Wolf wrote:Thousands of places have been running anti-iPad articles. They aren't original. But, I can't find anything terribly original about the iPad in the first place. I don't think Apple is standing in the way of forward progress, I think everybody is expecting something WOW and AMAZING from Apple every single time Apple releases a new product. Since Apple released a good product, but not an amazing one, everybody is like "Apple is lame. iPad is lame. Steve Jobs is lame."
"...even if e-ink provides a better reading experience for books (reading on an iPad will continue to literally mean staring into a lamp, just like reading on a computer screen), it doesn't matter because it's the total package of iTunes, iBookstore, 3G, games, apps etc. that will pull ebook readers along with it."
Couple that with Apple's control over the app store, which may seem passable on a phone but is arguably a problem with something breaching into computer technology. It's not a problem with the app store, per se, so much a problem with the way the app store in vetted.
-
- Posts: 1267
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:35 am
- Location: In Renegade_Turner's brain
Re: iPad
No thanks, I'll keep it. Even if the iPad isn't "innovative" like the iPhone was, it's still not a piece of crap.
Re: iPad
They're coming out with a bigger, 14 X 14 Inch version next year. I heard they'll be calling it the Max-I-pad.
Bah-domp tssh.
Bah-domp tssh.
-
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:07 pm
- Location: Behind the fuzzy wall of beard
- Contact:
Re: iPad
Stop using innovation as though hoping for it was somehow a ridiculous demand we're all making.
There's no relevant positive argument to it. Honestly, Apple made the bloody claim, and for the god awful price they're expecting the public to pay up for it I expect quality of product, beautiful design, and yes, innovation.
There's no relevant positive argument to it. Honestly, Apple made the bloody claim, and for the god awful price they're expecting the public to pay up for it I expect quality of product, beautiful design, and yes, innovation.
-
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 11:01 am
- Location: Lost in the Alps.
Re: iPad
Not if you shop smart. I bought a 2.5GHz, Dual-Core, 4GB of ram, 320GB widescreen laptop for only $750. Note that it has twice the power in literally every component, and has the added benefit that you can do pretty much anything on it.Armored Wolf wrote:You will find no other tablet for that price that's not a piece of crap.
Also, the computer I'm typing on now is a tricked out $400 netbook that still has better specs than the iPad. 1.6Ghz, 2GB RAM; the only thing it doesn't have is storage, as it only has a 16GB SSD. However it does have actual USB slots and an SD card reader, so honestly it's not much of a problem.
Edit: Whoops, didn't see the word tablet. You're probably right about that one, however for laptops, the market that the iPad really has competition with there's nothing the iPad has besides the touchscreen.
-
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:06 pm
- Location: U.S.
Re: iPad
Im actually kinda happy that Apple came out with Ipad ... because it means it will generate some demand for tablet PC's and in about a year or so other laptop companies will start cranking out these puppies at a lower price to undercut them
and ive always thought a tablet would be nice for texture editing ...
and ive always thought a tablet would be nice for texture editing ...
-
- Posts: 1267
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:35 am
- Location: In Renegade_Turner's brain
Re: iPad
It's going to be hard to come out with a tablet for cheaper, methinks.Assaultman67 wrote:Im actually kinda happy that Apple came out with Ipad ... because it means it will generate some demand for tablet PC's and in about a year or so other laptop companies will start cranking out these puppies at a lower price to undercut them
and ive always thought a tablet would be nice for texture editing ...
-
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:06 pm
- Location: U.S.
Re: iPad
No, LOL no it won't ... a tablet is basically a laptop with a special touch sensor within the screen ... and laptops can be made dirt cheap.
If demand goes up for those kinds of PC's then basically any laptop manufacturer should be able to roast them by cutting costs via mass production ...
Apple makes their profits from selling mediocre proprietary products in a stylish case to their cult-like followers for super expensive prices ... A PC manufacturer could probably beat them out simply because the PC market is much more cutthroat than the "Apple" market ...
If demand goes up for those kinds of PC's then basically any laptop manufacturer should be able to roast them by cutting costs via mass production ...
Apple makes their profits from selling mediocre proprietary products in a stylish case to their cult-like followers for super expensive prices ... A PC manufacturer could probably beat them out simply because the PC market is much more cutthroat than the "Apple" market ...
Re: iPad
This isn't a Mac vs PC debate.Armored Wolf wrote:You are in risk of violating Rule #8 of the Wolfire Forums, set down by hdlsa the fruit salad on May 31th, 2005.
But anyway, I'm trying to decide if it really fills the slot between the MacBooks and the iPods.
-
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:06 pm
- Location: U.S.
Re: iPad
It isn't really a Mac vs PC debate ...
Its more of a discussion about supply and demand as well as overhead costs (although my PC bias definitely was visible) ... and i laughed when i saw this ...
I honestly don't understand how one company that produces their own proprietary parts for their own proprietary product could beat out several companies that can use standardized parts ...
Its the same reason Toyota, Honda, Hyundai, as well as other far eastern car companies can beat out companies like Ford and GM ...
they're streamlined and deadly like a mongoose ... where as ford and gm are slow and fat like a obese squirrel ...
Its more of a discussion about supply and demand as well as overhead costs (although my PC bias definitely was visible) ... and i laughed when i saw this ...
I honestly don't understand how one company that produces their own proprietary parts for their own proprietary product could beat out several companies that can use standardized parts ...
Its the same reason Toyota, Honda, Hyundai, as well as other far eastern car companies can beat out companies like Ford and GM ...
they're streamlined and deadly like a mongoose ... where as ford and gm are slow and fat like a obese squirrel ...