Wolfire Games Forums

I think it's just that we find attractive, I don't keep pics of my ex, what ever Ren may do, and since I'm single at the moment, I can't post any...

Just post a pic of someone you find attractive, and allow Ren to flame you to hell for having a different opinion to his.

zoidberg rules wrote: Just post a pic of someone you find attractive, and allow Ren to flame you to hell for having a different opinion to his.

Spoken like a true veteran of this forum.

I don't think any of the girls posted in this thread are anything special. They're attractive, but their "outfits" are a turn-off. Could I do better in real life? Probably.

Renegayed_Turner wrote:I don't think any of the girls posted in this thread are anything special. They're attractive, but their "outfits" are a turn-off. Could I do better in real life? Probably.

If they had the "outfits" we'd want - they it wouldn't be allowed on the forums.

invertin wrote:She looks like she starved to death.

"Better" would be someone who has eaten at some point in their lifetime.

Hahaha fat chick love. That's good. Anyway, I'm not sure how you could find someone unattractive because they don't have flab hanging off them.

Renegayed_Turner wrote:Wait... so is this thread to post pictures of girl's we've hooked up with, or post pictures of girls we think are attractive? If it's to post pictures of girls we think are attractive, zoidberg can say whatever the hell he wants.

I'm assuming he'd only go for girls he finds attractive. Maybe he has low standards. In such a case, he won't have anything to submit.

Renegayed_Turner wrote:Could I do better in real life? Probably.

The fact that I referred to it as "real life" in this post that I wrote on my other account really speaks volumes about the irony of my post.

zoidberg rules basically wrote:I've never done better because I've never been with anyone.

lol that's okay.

i tend to have sex with girls that all range from 100-120 lbs

if you think thats disgusting and they are "starved" than so be it, its just my preference i suppose.

different strokes for different folks.


why herro

Renegade_Turner wrote:

invertin wrote:She looks like she starved to death.

"Better" would be someone who has eaten at some point in their lifetime.

Hahaha fat chick love. That's good. Anyway, I'm not sure how you could find someone unattractive because they don't have flab hanging off them.

There is a difference between "having flab hanging off of them" and "being more than skin and bones"

Seriously look at that person at the beginning of the first post. Please find a part of her body that isn't covered by clothes where the bones aren't visible.

The rest of them aren't quite as bad. Nothing I'd wank to but it doesn't make my stomach feel painful.

Don't know how much 100 something lbs is in stones sooo...

Blorx wrote:Spoken like a true veteran of this forum.

I feel very proud of myself now. Thank you Blorx

Oh, and Ren, everybody I know knows that I have been with people, it's just that they seem to have a nasty habit of being bitches, dumping me, and getting me into a depression, think about what you are saying before you post.

Renegade_Turner wrote:

zoidberg rules basically wrote:I've never done better because I've never been with anyone.

lol that's okay.

That's low, Ren. Even for you.

Freshbite wrote:

Renegade_Turner wrote:

zoidberg rules basically wrote:I've never done better because I've never been with anyone.

lol that's okay.

That's low, Ren. Even for you.

Yeah, he's cruising for a temp ban.

underthedeep wrote:i tend to have sex with girls that all range from 100-120 lbs

You should specify height and age.

Fournine wrote:

underthedeep wrote:i tend to have sex with girls that all range from 100-120 lbs

You should specify height and age.

Jailbait...

i don't feel like sharing THAT much info with the forum.

but i will just say this. im 19. girls my age. mostly around 5'4.


jail is no fun.

The fact that I referred to it as "real life" in this post that I wrote on my other account really speaks volumes about the irony of my post.

Damn. I'm right!

underthedeep wrote:mostly around 5'4.

No love for midgets?