Page 4 of 8

Re: Overgrowth Wiki

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 3:01 pm
by last
Added some long forgotten (shortcut) keyes under Control Reference
they are:
Object browser| press 'cmd-l' || To enter object browser menu

Decal Selection tool /decal editor mode| press 'cmd-2' || To enter Decal selection/editor tool

Select decal that is under another decal| mouse wheel up/down || This onley works when you have atleast 2 decalsand one is on top of another. You need to select atleast 1 decal first and your mouse cursor needs to be on top of that one you want to select to do it

force decal(s) to map onley one object/group| hold i || selected decal will onley map with that object that is directly underneath your mouse

force decal(s) to project onley those object(s) that you want them to| press o || selected decal will onley map with that object that is directly underneath your mouse

projection pox/angel| press p || to make projection box for decal

Re: Overgrowth Wiki

Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2011 5:40 pm
by FireDart
Updated Alpha List with the links to the Change Log's:
http://wiki.wolfire.com/index.php/Alpha_List

Hope to update some other stuff soon.

Re: Overgrowth Wiki

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:28 am
by Aaron
FireDart wrote:Updated Alpha List with the links to the Change Log's:
http://wiki.wolfire.com/index.php/Alpha_List

Hope to update some other stuff soon.
Thanks for taking the time to do this, I know how tedious it can be :)

Re: Overgrowth Wiki

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:53 pm
by Conner36
Samusaaron3 wrote:
FireDart wrote:Updated Alpha List with the links to the Change Log's:
http://wiki.wolfire.com/index.php/Alpha_List

Hope to update some other stuff soon.
Thanks for taking the time to do this, I know how tedious it can be :)
:) thx from me too.

Re: Overgrowth Wiki

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 6:58 pm
by Nekros22
Is the silly description in the "History" tab of the Cats' page an inside joke or does it need to be deleted?

http://wiki.wolfire.com/index.php/Cats

Re: Overgrowth Wiki

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:07 pm
by Conner36
I think that it's just fan humor, but hey, why not keep it?

Re: Overgrowth Wiki

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:30 pm
by Johannes
Hahaha, I think it's ridiculous enough that people won't be confused by it.

In any case there isn't really much history that's been released yet, so until there is I'm totally ok with that being there as a placeholder.

Re: Overgrowth Wiki

Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:41 am
by Conner36
anyone feel like helping consolidate the OG FAQ with the basic tutorial?

Re: Overgrowth Wiki

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 1:59 am
by Conner36
why doesn't the wiki script code/language work?
example http://wiki.wolfire.com/index.php/Template:Transclude

Re: Overgrowth Wiki

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:40 pm
by Conner36
Hey Jeff can you add some extensions to the wiki?
ParserFunctions is one that allows the use of code to build things. It doesn't have to be that one specifically but something that would allow tabs or navboxes.

Re: Overgrowth Wiki

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 11:15 am
by Nekros22
Are the "theories" listed on Turner's page as popular as the author made them out to be? They seem less like explanations and more like fan-fiction.

http://wiki.wolfire.com/index.php/Turner

Re: Overgrowth Wiki

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 11:19 am
by Endoperez
... indeed.

It seems like all that was added by one person in one batch, near the end of November.

Re: Overgrowth Wiki

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 11:24 am
by Nekros22
Endoperez wrote:... indeed.

It seems like all that was added by one person in one batch, near the end of November.
What would you recommend?

I'm not familiar with Wolfire's wiki policy.

Re: Overgrowth Wiki

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:04 pm
by Silverfish
I have been taught that personal theories do not belong on a Wiki, but since this isn't Wikipedia I don't know what the rules are. I personally would vote for removing them.

Re: Overgrowth Wiki

Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 10:56 pm
by Johannes
There really aren't any set rules as far as I know, Wolfire is giving us pretty free reign there. If in doubt, it should require a source.

Perhaps move them to discussion page?