Babes

Anything else
User avatar
zoidberg rules
Posts: 1788
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:44 pm

Re: Babes

Post by zoidberg rules » Sun May 23, 2010 12:42 pm

I think it's just that we find attractive, I don't keep pics of my ex, what ever Ren may do, and since I'm single at the moment, I can't post any...

Just post a pic of someone you find attractive, and allow Ren to flame you to hell for having a different opinion to his. :lol:

User avatar
Blorx
NOT A FRIGGIN PROGRAMMER
Posts: 3272
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: South Carolina, United States
Contact:

Re: Babes

Post by Blorx » Sun May 23, 2010 2:03 pm

zoidberg rules wrote: Just post a pic of someone you find attractive, and allow Ren to flame you to hell for having a different opinion to his. :lol:
Spoken like a true veteran of this forum. :mrgreen:

Gifted
Posts: 232
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:29 pm

Re: Babes

Post by Gifted » Sun May 23, 2010 2:11 pm

I don't think any of the girls posted in this thread are anything special. They're attractive, but their "outfits" are a turn-off. Could I do better in real life? Probably.

User avatar
Catmentra
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 8:40 pm
Location: Student
Contact:

Re: Babes

Post by Catmentra » Sun May 23, 2010 2:14 pm

Renegayed_Turner wrote:I don't think any of the girls posted in this thread are anything special. They're attractive, but their "outfits" are a turn-off. Could I do better in real life? Probably.
If they had the "outfits" we'd want - they it wouldn't be allowed on the forums.

User avatar
Renegade_Turner
Gramps
Posts: 6942
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am

Re: Babes

Post by Renegade_Turner » Sun May 23, 2010 10:27 pm

invertin wrote:She looks like she starved to death.

"Better" would be someone who has eaten at some point in their lifetime.
Hahaha fat chick love. That's good. Anyway, I'm not sure how you could find someone unattractive because they don't have flab hanging off them.
Renegayed_Turner wrote:Wait... so is this thread to post pictures of girl's we've hooked up with, or post pictures of girls we think are attractive? If it's to post pictures of girls we think are attractive, zoidberg can say whatever the hell he wants.
I'm assuming he'd only go for girls he finds attractive. Maybe he has low standards. In such a case, he won't have anything to submit.
Renegayed_Turner wrote:Could I do better in real life? Probably.
The fact that I referred to it as "real life" in this post that I wrote on my other account really speaks volumes about the irony of my post.
zoidberg rules basically wrote:I've never done better because I've never been with anyone.
lol that's okay.

User avatar
underthedeep
Posts: 1099
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: southern california
Contact:

Re: Babes

Post by underthedeep » Mon May 24, 2010 3:29 am

i tend to have sex with girls that all range from 100-120 lbs

if you think thats disgusting and they are "starved" than so be it, its just my preference i suppose.

different strokes for different folks.
Image

why herro

User avatar
invertin
Sticky
Posts: 3828
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 4:05 am
Location: IN A CAN OF AWESOME!

Re: Babes

Post by invertin » Mon May 24, 2010 10:10 am

Renegade_Turner wrote:
invertin wrote:She looks like she starved to death.

"Better" would be someone who has eaten at some point in their lifetime.
Hahaha fat chick love. That's good. Anyway, I'm not sure how you could find someone unattractive because they don't have flab hanging off them.
There is a difference between "having flab hanging off of them" and "being more than skin and bones"

Seriously look at that person at the beginning of the first post. Please find a part of her body that isn't covered by clothes where the bones aren't visible.

The rest of them aren't quite as bad. Nothing I'd wank to but it doesn't make my stomach feel painful.

User avatar
zoidberg rules
Posts: 1788
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:44 pm

Re: Babes

Post by zoidberg rules » Mon May 24, 2010 10:57 am

Don't know how much 100 something lbs is in stones sooo...
Blorx wrote:Spoken like a true veteran of this forum. :mrgreen:
I feel very proud of myself now. Thank you Blorx :D

Oh, and Ren, everybody I know knows that I have been with people, it's just that they seem to have a nasty habit of being bitches, dumping me, and getting me into a depression, think about what you are saying before you post. :?

User avatar
Freshbite
Posts: 3256
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 3:02 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden.

Re: Babes

Post by Freshbite » Mon May 24, 2010 12:08 pm

Renegade_Turner wrote:
zoidberg rules basically wrote:I've never done better because I've never been with anyone.
lol that's okay.
That's low, Ren. Even for you.

User avatar
Blorx
NOT A FRIGGIN PROGRAMMER
Posts: 3272
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: South Carolina, United States
Contact:

Re: Babes

Post by Blorx » Mon May 24, 2010 12:13 pm

Freshbite wrote:
Renegade_Turner wrote:
zoidberg rules basically wrote:I've never done better because I've never been with anyone.
lol that's okay.
That's low, Ren. Even for you.
Yeah, he's cruising for a temp ban. :roll:

User avatar
Fournine
.hacker
Posts: 938
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 3:07 am
Location: Boron group, period 5

Re: Babes

Post by Fournine » Mon May 24, 2010 1:16 pm

underthedeep wrote:i tend to have sex with girls that all range from 100-120 lbs
You should specify height and age.

User avatar
Blorx
NOT A FRIGGIN PROGRAMMER
Posts: 3272
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: South Carolina, United States
Contact:

Re: Babes

Post by Blorx » Mon May 24, 2010 1:19 pm

Fournine wrote:
underthedeep wrote:i tend to have sex with girls that all range from 100-120 lbs
You should specify height and age.
:lol:

Jailbait...

User avatar
underthedeep
Posts: 1099
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: southern california
Contact:

Re: Babes

Post by underthedeep » Mon May 24, 2010 2:11 pm

i don't feel like sharing THAT much info with the forum.

but i will just say this. im 19. girls my age. mostly around 5'4.


jail is no fun.

Gifted
Posts: 232
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:29 pm

Re: Babes

Post by Gifted » Mon May 24, 2010 7:21 pm

The fact that I referred to it as "real life" in this post that I wrote on my other account really speaks volumes about the irony of my post.
Damn. I'm right!

User avatar
invertin
Sticky
Posts: 3828
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 4:05 am
Location: IN A CAN OF AWESOME!

Re: Babes

Post by invertin » Mon May 24, 2010 8:43 pm

underthedeep wrote:mostly around 5'4.
No love for midgets?

Locked