Film Comp

Anything else

Which movie is better?

Untadaike's movie.
10
83%
Blind Pew's movie.
2
17%
 
Total votes: 12

User avatar
Untadaike
Posts: 1660
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:46 pm
Contact:

Film Comp

Post by Untadaike » Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:11 pm

What do you get when you cross a poster board with a dophinator?
Last edited by Untadaike on Sun Sep 04, 2011 11:41 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Count Roland
Posts: 2937
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:15 pm
Location: Galapagos Islands, rodeoin some turtles.
Contact:

Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!

Post by Count Roland » Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:13 pm

shouldn't he be allowed to choose which one we're to judge?

User avatar
Untadaike
Posts: 1660
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!

Post by Untadaike » Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:32 pm

He did. He linked me to the one he wanted to enter. Don't worry, this is fair. He-hem.

User avatar
Count Roland
Posts: 2937
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:15 pm
Location: Galapagos Islands, rodeoin some turtles.
Contact:

Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!

Post by Count Roland » Fri Jun 05, 2009 6:21 pm

ok I refuse to partake if you're going to make it fair.

User avatar
Richie Rabbit
Posts: 913
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 12:07 am

Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!

Post by Richie Rabbit » Fri Jun 05, 2009 6:35 pm

I pick Untadaike's movie because his movie does not have the shooting of rabbits.. :cry: but the savage beating of children :twisted:

User avatar
Blind Pew
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 7:11 pm
Location: The other place

Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!

Post by Blind Pew » Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:07 pm

you guys just don't understand the priceless irreverent human that you are experiencing when you watch mine.

Undtadaike's movie is just stupid and un-creative.

User avatar
Richie Rabbit
Posts: 913
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 12:07 am

Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!

Post by Richie Rabbit » Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:37 pm

Oh snap.. HHhmmmm... maybe you're right. 8)

User avatar
Endoperez
Posts: 5668
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 7:41 am
Location: cold and dark and lovely Finland

Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!

Post by Endoperez » Sat Jun 06, 2009 1:22 am

Blind Pew wrote:you guys just don't understand the priceless irreverent human that you are experiencing when you watch mine.

Undtadaike's movie is just stupid and un-creative.
Untadaike's movie has an interesting start and a nice end, it has cuts that work well and interesting camera angles.

Your animation has boring and unnecessary text in the beginning and end, the cuts are too fast and the camera angles are basic.

Cuts and camera angles are easier to do on film (since retaking a shot is much faster than redrawing it), but no one said it'd be fair comparing two "movies" made so differently. Both were much better than I expected to see.

User avatar
Glabbit
Posts: 4917
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:38 am
Location: A mile away, with your shoes!

Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!

Post by Glabbit » Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:13 am

*bursts out in maniacal laughter*
This is going to be interesting... Let's see those results >=3

User avatar
invertin
Sticky
Posts: 3828
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 4:05 am
Location: IN A CAN OF AWESOME!

Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!

Post by invertin » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:03 am

Blind Pew wrote:you guys just don't understand the priceless irreverent human that you are experiencing when you watch mine.
I saw a jerkface shoot a rabbit, hate nature, kill nature, then get nuked for some reason.

Because nukes are good for the environment.

On the other hand, I saw someone shouting, someone else shouting, running, then hitting.

So I don't really know what the fark is going on in either.

User avatar
Zhukov
Posts: 1049
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:58 am
Location: Elsewhere.

Post by Zhukov » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:24 am

Untadaike's entry makes me wonder what the heck is going on.

Blind Pew's entry makes me wonder if the maker has any idea what is going on.

User avatar
Renegade_Turner
Gramps
Posts: 6942
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am

Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!

Post by Renegade_Turner » Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:05 am

The kid is clearly chasing the other kid because he wants his lunch money.

Untadaike's is better.

User avatar
invertin
Sticky
Posts: 3828
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 4:05 am
Location: IN A CAN OF AWESOME!

Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!

Post by invertin » Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:08 am

I must thank this topic for one thing...
invertin wrote:fark
I have now discovered my favorite swearing substitute.

User avatar
shadow717
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:28 am
Location: Hunting down Andy.
Contact:

Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!

Post by shadow717 » Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:40 am

Blind pews sucked. HARD. Idiotic story, bad animation, nuclear frolicking bomb? Why in the hell is the U.S. Air force dropping a NUKE on American FRIGGIN SOIL? WHAT THE HELL?

While Untadike didn't make the story clear it made me want to watch more. I vote for Untadaike, because the camera angles were good, the music fitted what was going on, and it was generally much better than Blind Pews animation.

User avatar
Endoperez
Posts: 5668
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 7:41 am
Location: cold and dark and lovely Finland

Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!

Post by Endoperez » Sat Jun 06, 2009 1:54 pm

shadow717 wrote:Blind pews sucked. HARD. Idiotic story, bad animation, nuclear frolicking bomb? Why in the hell is the U.S. Air force dropping a NUKE on American FRIGGIN SOIL? WHAT THE HELL?
All animation is absurd. A bunny? walking on hind legs? Speaking? Living in a hole that has a mailbox? It makes no sense!

The bomb was nuclear because it's the easiest way to show off a huge explosion. The animation was decent, the only bad thing about it was the drawings. The story wasn't idiotic, but the quick cuts made it too sudden.

For an animation made by a single person, it's not bad. It sucks if you compare it to something made by a professional, but that's way different. The idea worked, and with attention to things like camera angles it could have been good. It would take lots and lots of polish before it'd look great, but I thought it showed promise.

Post Reply