Film Comp
-
- Posts: 2937
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:15 pm
- Location: Galapagos Islands, rodeoin some turtles.
- Contact:
Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!
shouldn't he be allowed to choose which one we're to judge?
Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!
He did. He linked me to the one he wanted to enter. Don't worry, this is fair. He-hem.
-
- Posts: 2937
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:15 pm
- Location: Galapagos Islands, rodeoin some turtles.
- Contact:
Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!
ok I refuse to partake if you're going to make it fair.
-
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 12:07 am
Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!
I pick Untadaike's movie because his movie does not have the shooting of rabbits.. but the savage beating of children
Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!
you guys just don't understand the priceless irreverent human that you are experiencing when you watch mine.
Undtadaike's movie is just stupid and un-creative.
Undtadaike's movie is just stupid and un-creative.
-
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 12:07 am
Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!
Oh snap.. HHhmmmm... maybe you're right.
Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!
Untadaike's movie has an interesting start and a nice end, it has cuts that work well and interesting camera angles.Blind Pew wrote:you guys just don't understand the priceless irreverent human that you are experiencing when you watch mine.
Undtadaike's movie is just stupid and un-creative.
Your animation has boring and unnecessary text in the beginning and end, the cuts are too fast and the camera angles are basic.
Cuts and camera angles are easier to do on film (since retaking a shot is much faster than redrawing it), but no one said it'd be fair comparing two "movies" made so differently. Both were much better than I expected to see.
Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!
*bursts out in maniacal laughter*
This is going to be interesting... Let's see those results >=3
This is going to be interesting... Let's see those results >=3
Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!
I saw a jerkface shoot a rabbit, hate nature, kill nature, then get nuked for some reason.Blind Pew wrote:you guys just don't understand the priceless irreverent human that you are experiencing when you watch mine.
Because nukes are good for the environment.
On the other hand, I saw someone shouting, someone else shouting, running, then hitting.
So I don't really know what the fark is going on in either.
-
- Gramps
- Posts: 6942
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am
Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!
The kid is clearly chasing the other kid because he wants his lunch money.
Untadaike's is better.
Untadaike's is better.
Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!
I must thank this topic for one thing...
I have now discovered my favorite swearing substitute.invertin wrote:fark
Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!
Blind pews sucked. HARD. Idiotic story, bad animation, nuclear frolicking bomb? Why in the hell is the U.S. Air force dropping a NUKE on American FRIGGIN SOIL? WHAT THE HELL?
While Untadike didn't make the story clear it made me want to watch more. I vote for Untadaike, because the camera angles were good, the music fitted what was going on, and it was generally much better than Blind Pews animation.
While Untadike didn't make the story clear it made me want to watch more. I vote for Untadaike, because the camera angles were good, the music fitted what was going on, and it was generally much better than Blind Pews animation.
Re: Blind Pew vs. Untadaike film competition - please vote!
All animation is absurd. A bunny? walking on hind legs? Speaking? Living in a hole that has a mailbox? It makes no sense!shadow717 wrote:Blind pews sucked. HARD. Idiotic story, bad animation, nuclear frolicking bomb? Why in the hell is the U.S. Air force dropping a NUKE on American FRIGGIN SOIL? WHAT THE HELL?
The bomb was nuclear because it's the easiest way to show off a huge explosion. The animation was decent, the only bad thing about it was the drawings. The story wasn't idiotic, but the quick cuts made it too sudden.
For an animation made by a single person, it's not bad. It sucks if you compare it to something made by a professional, but that's way different. The idea worked, and with attention to things like camera angles it could have been good. It would take lots and lots of polish before it'd look great, but I thought it showed promise.