Wolfire Games Forums

I think something just went over my head. What?

[edit]you know you haven't been on the forum much when someone doesn't know who you are.

I might be the oldest active member aside from viking. Or has he gone too?[/edit]

yea, I'm writing another app. I'm trying to remember the format from memory. something like (if someone else wants to try): Header: short v; // number of vertices short t; // number of triangles Data: (for each vertex) { float x; float y; float z; } (for each triangle) { short ref[3]; // index numbe...

well, david gave me the format a loooooong while back. and don't get excited, 'cuz I lost the code, so if anyone wants to use it I'll have to write it again.

[edit] and, bunny with stick, I'm a SOLID linux/mac user. Anything I write will work with mac, guaranteed.[/edit]

I can make you any kind of knife you'd like, but good luck modding the sword and staff. You can't change the shape at all. I can :) I wrote a program to convert various triangle files (i.e. 3ds, triangle-ized objs, etc.) into .solid files. I wasn't much of a modeler, so I never did anything with it.

nahh, McDs has Chicken Selects. However, BK has good fries. I'd call it even, even though BK is dying.

hell, I don't necessarily mind republicans, but this administration...?

look what we have to deal with in the us! http://www.cantonrep.com/index.php?ID=3 ... ategory=23

ooh, I have the same problem with linux. sort of. I use both, and I'm planning on getting a license; do I need two?

yea, but those use obj-c to bind them.
Cocoa in it's nature is an objective-c api; it is ismply a set of objective-c functions. It is nothing more.

Oh, I guess java can use it too, but why use java unless for its portability?

I'm not in it for the money. Plus, developing for means using... much to painful of an experience. No, I'm not joking. I could never live without my quicksilver, my terminal.app, my gcc, my itunes, my camino, etc.

Cocoa is most commonly used with Obj-C. The problem there is that Obj-C has limited platform support, and Cocoa has none (except Mac, ofcourse). You can fake an OO paradigm with C using structs and pointers to functions, but really, why bother? _Nik First off, cocoa can ONLY be used with obj-c, unl...

well, I was only aiming for a small example.

Basically: I feel as if everything c++ offers is either useless to me, or can be implemented in C. Others feel differently; to each his own.

the world is degrading.

If you ever attempt to write code for the mac (maybe you already do, I don't know), take a look at carbon. I use cocoa when I do guis, but it's a nice example. You don't have to use C++ to do OO. C can do it to. the difference: //blah blah blah... ObjectPtr obj; int err = ObjectDoSomethingWithObj(ob...

the only reason I can find for C++ is polymorphism. Other than that, I find that it's an overhyped bloated language. And libstdc++ is crap... why write a string class when you can just use functions? char * IS the basic string-I want to be able to just write it via fwrite. none of that cout << busin...

well.. chess.app, for sure... big fan of gnop...