Well EA, This Is Very Dodgy
-
Renegade_Turner
- Gramps
- Posts: 6942
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am
Well EA, This Is Very Dodgy
http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/08 ... -sinister/
Surely they're going to want to change this? I can't imagine people not kicking up a fucking stink about this.
Surely they're going to want to change this? I can't imagine people not kicking up a fucking stink about this.
Re: Well EA, This Is Very Dodgy
I think I might just not buy their products. brings back memories from a south park episode about apple.
-
Assaultman67
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:06 pm
- Location: U.S.
Re: Well EA, This Is Very Dodgy
Thats the problem with EULA's and legal stuff
People just assume you make a transaction and use it normally. However there is so much more in there that you're agreeing to.
Its kinda a dirty trick ... but that's lawyers for you.
People just assume you make a transaction and use it normally. However there is so much more in there that you're agreeing to.
Its kinda a dirty trick ... but that's lawyers for you.
Yeah, saw this elsewhere. It smells.
I wouldn't care, but they're making Origin mandatory for some of their new games, like how Steam is for Valve games. So if you want to play Battlefield 3 on the PC you have to install Origin, even if you bought the game retail.
Which sucks. I can life without BF3, but if they do the same thing for Mass Effect 3... well, they have me by the short-and-curlies on that one.
I'm damn glad they're being called out on this.
I wouldn't care, but they're making Origin mandatory for some of their new games, like how Steam is for Valve games. So if you want to play Battlefield 3 on the PC you have to install Origin, even if you bought the game retail.
Which sucks. I can life without BF3, but if they do the same thing for Mass Effect 3... well, they have me by the short-and-curlies on that one.
I'm damn glad they're being called out on this.
-
Ragdollmaster
- Posts: 2343
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:49 am
- Location: Island of Lugaru
Re: Well EA, This Is Very Dodgy
That's certainly rather fishy. That said, I'm not personally concerned with it since I'll likely be picking up Battlefield 3 for my console, but it's still pretty shady.
-
Grayswandir
- Short end of the stick
- Posts: 3655
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 12:37 am
- Location: Robbing the cradle.
Re: Well EA, This Is Very Dodgy
So apparently EA has redrafted the EULA:
http://www.giantbomb.com/news/ea-revise ... ster/3624/
http://eacom.s3.amazonaws.com/EULA_Origin_8.24.11.pdf
http://www.giantbomb.com/news/ea-revise ... ster/3624/
http://eacom.s3.amazonaws.com/EULA_Origin_8.24.11.pdf
-
Renegade_Turner
- Gramps
- Posts: 6942
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am
Re: Well EA, This Is Very Dodgy
Apparently Battlefield 3's maps are going to be scaled down for console versions and run at a lower amount of frames per second, think it's set at 30 FPS for the console versions. This concerned me, but thanks Grayswandir, good news is good.
-
Grayswandir
- Short end of the stick
- Posts: 3655
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 12:37 am
- Location: Robbing the cradle.
Re: Well EA, This Is Very Dodgy
We'll see how good the news actually is Andy, from what I understand it basically says the same thing but its worded differently. Knowing EA its still probably just as bad, but now its all nice and happy instead of openly dorking people in the ass.
Honestly, 30fps isn't really bad, as for scaling down the maps it makes sense. There are going to be less players on the maps, so having more space with less players means more players wandering around looking for other players to shoot and less time actually shooting.
Honestly, 30fps isn't really bad, as for scaling down the maps it makes sense. There are going to be less players on the maps, so having more space with less players means more players wandering around looking for other players to shoot and less time actually shooting.
-
Ragdollmaster
- Posts: 2343
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:49 am
- Location: Island of Lugaru
Re: Well EA, This Is Very Dodgy
Yeah it's because the PC version has up to 64 players online while the console versions have only up to 24, I believe. The areas on maps will be slightly smaller, but I think, considering how a lot of Battlefield 2's maps were like, that this means they'll just be denser without as much empty terrain between bases/urban areas etc. The flyspace for helicopters and jets will remain the same as in the PC versions, as it would be kind of hard to hurtle around in a jet going like 1500kph in a map that's barely a kilometer in length 
Read the revised EULA.
It's not much better. Just the same thing in friendlier words and surrounded by platitudes. It still collects information on everything you have installed. Also, the part about giving your information to third parties says, "EA would never..." What it should say is, "EA may not..."
At least they removed the part that said that they could record your name, your address, your kid's names, your kid's schools and give it away to whoever they damn well please.
It's not much better. Just the same thing in friendlier words and surrounded by platitudes. It still collects information on everything you have installed. Also, the part about giving your information to third parties says, "EA would never..." What it should say is, "EA may not..."
At least they removed the part that said that they could record your name, your address, your kid's names, your kid's schools and give it away to whoever they damn well please.
-
Renegade_Turner
- Gramps
- Posts: 6942
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am
Re: Well EA, This Is Very Dodgy
Even if there is a few nicks, it is better.
-
Assaultman67
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:06 pm
- Location: U.S.
Re: Well EA, This Is Very Dodgy
I don't really get it ...
I mean all they did was rephrase it with a different tone. They didn't really make any changes in their policy at all
Could someone explain where the changes in their policy is?
I mean if I said "put a stick up your bum" and someone got upset so I changed it to "please insert this stick into your rectum, because we care" would it really be any better?
I mean all they did was rephrase it with a different tone. They didn't really make any changes in their policy at all
Could someone explain where the changes in their policy is?
I mean if I said "put a stick up your bum" and someone got upset so I changed it to "please insert this stick into your rectum, because we care" would it really be any better?
Re: Well EA, This Is Very Dodgy
That's the lawyer way. Nice and gently, lots of words, but...
-
underthedeep
- Posts: 1099
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:18 pm
- Location: southern california
- Contact:
Re: Well EA, This Is Very Dodgy
YEAH FUCK EA
- Attachments
-
- andymemevideogames.jpg (120.37 KiB) Viewed 4039 times
Re: Well EA, This Is Very Dodgy
Dear Underthedeep, you are a scholar and a gentleman.
My flatemate just rushed in the room wondering what I was laughing so loudly at.
My flatemate just rushed in the room wondering what I was laughing so loudly at.