David Belle
Re: David Belle
You de-un-rerailed us by talking about the super extend last edition of last.
Yes, I luv teh Go Cops cuz it's funny as heck.
Yes, I luv teh Go Cops cuz it's funny as heck.
Re: David Belle
Wait, how is that ontopic? Should we instead talk about how David Belle must have really thick skin for rolling after such high jumps on gravel(and the similar) without a shirt on? Or should we discuss cliche phrases that make no sense, such as "I could care less," which has the intent of saying you don't care, but instead it says that there are things less careable about, meaning you do care, giving a completely opposite meaning to what it was that was meant to be said. Also "You can say that again," which practically says nothing except the fact that you are able to speak.
Re: David Belle
Or calling someone a stubborn ass. Stubborness shows dedication and commitment and what animal do people most often use for work? The ass. And why? Because it's tough, reliable, and a hard worker. So, by my logic, Endoperez is our resident ass, while David is a super ass and Aubrey is ninja ass. Jeff's the web ass, and John's is the kilt wearing ass. I'm the lazy ass, which is a contradiction in terms.
-
Assaultman67
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:06 pm
- Location: U.S.
Re: David Belle
The phrase "I could care less" is a mutation of "I couldn't care less". the saying either mutated when someone missheard it and repeated what they thought they heard without thinking much about it or it got filtered through someone incredibly dumb with a horrible accent.adwuga wrote:... Or should we discuss cliche phrases that make no sense, such as "I could care less," which has the intent of saying you don't care, but instead it says that there are things less careable about, meaning you do care, giving a completely opposite meaning to what it was that was meant to be said. Also "You can say that again," which practically says nothing except the fact that you are able to speak.
Or perhaps it was originally bitter sarcasm that somehow lost its sarcastic weight over time.
Stubbornness in farm animals isn't a good trait. My uncle's horse is horrible at this. Somedays he indifferent to letting you ride him and other days he won't let you get near him with a saddle. Either way you don't have a chance unless you bribe him with corn mealKorban3 wrote:Or calling someone a stubborn ass. Stubborness shows dedication and commitment and what animal do people most often use for work? The ass. And why? Because it's tough, reliable, and a hard worker. So, by my logic, Endoperez is our resident ass, while David is a super ass and Aubrey is ninja ass. Jeff's the web ass, and John's is the kilt wearing ass. I'm the lazy ass, which is a contradiction in terms.
Anywho, trying to get an ass to work when it doesn't want to is ... really really fucking hard.
You pretty much have to break the animal very thoroughly and reward it frequently for work completed if you want the work done.
Re: David Belle
Which is a good reason for the saying to die. Then it can go crawl in a hole. Which also doesn't give the intended meaning since it really means crawling around in a hole, instead of crawling into a hole.Assaultman67 wrote:The phrase "I could care less" is a mutation of "I couldn't care less". the saying either mutated when someone missheard it and repeated what they thought they heard without thinking much about it or it got filtered through someone incredibly dumb with a horrible accent.adwuga wrote:... Or should we discuss cliche phrases that make no sense, such as "I could care less," which has the intent of saying you don't care, but instead it says that there are things less careable about, meaning you do care, giving a completely opposite meaning to what it was that was meant to be said. Also "You can say that again," which practically says nothing except the fact that you are able to speak.
Or perhaps it was originally bitter sarcasm that somehow lost its sarcastic weight over time.
Also, who kills birds with a stone?
-
Assaultman67
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:06 pm
- Location: U.S.
Re: David Belle
Why not just say the phrase properly and replace "could" with "couldn't"?
This linguistic mutation is the same sort that makes people say "literally" when they mean "figuratively".
Somehow the meaning isn't lost even though the exact opposite of what they meant is said. So in the end, it doesn't really matter that much either way you say it.
The saying is an analogy designed to describe the concept of working towards two goals simultaneously using a smart solution rather than both goals individually. In the end, it tends to save time.
This linguistic mutation is the same sort that makes people say "literally" when they mean "figuratively".
Somehow the meaning isn't lost even though the exact opposite of what they meant is said. So in the end, it doesn't really matter that much either way you say it.
Not many people have, it's more that many people have probably wanted to at one time (hunting or whatever)adwuga wrote:... Also, who kills birds with a stone?
The saying is an analogy designed to describe the concept of working towards two goals simultaneously using a smart solution rather than both goals individually. In the end, it tends to save time.
-
Renegade_Turner
- Gramps
- Posts: 6942
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am
Re: David Belle
I literally could care less about this conversation.
I think you should find a partner who fulfills your strange fetishes to a greater extent, as opposed to one who you need to bribe in order to let you ride him.Assaultman67 wrote:Somedays he indifferent to letting you ride him and other days he won't let you get near him with a saddle. Either way you don't have a chance unless you bribe him with corn meal
Re: David Belle
Quotation out of context. BAD!
Re: David Belle
adwuga wrote: Also, who kills birds with a stone?
He just practices with golf balls because they're smaller. This way, he knows he can hit the birds.
-
Assaultman67
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:06 pm
- Location: U.S.
Re: David Belle
This cues the topic of today discussion in Verbal Internet Wankery 101!adwuga wrote:Quotation out of context. BAD!
Today's lesson:
Conflict between users
The key to possibly winning (but never losing) a conflict is to never take the defensive position. It will only be a signal to your opposition that their comment was effective.
Rather than taking up a defensive position of denial or correction, you should instead shrug off the comment and take up the offensive by either insulting them back with a beautifully crafted quip or simply by trying to make them suddenly feel uncomfortable.
Observe the two cases below:
'I'M NOT INTO THAT!"""Renegade_Turner wrote:... I think you should find a partner who fulfills your strange fetishes to a greater extent, as opposed to one who you need to bribe in order to let you ride him.
(This was the wrong response as it only displays you have been affected negatively by the comment.)
Oh! Are you volunteering?Renegade_Turner wrote:... I think you should find a partner who fulfills your strange fetishes to a greater extent, as opposed to one who you need to bribe in order to let you ride him.
My nipples are heavily aroused by this.

Re: David Belle
I dont care about what you say! That image isn't disturbing!
(what not to do)
(what not to do)
-
Grayswandir
- Short end of the stick
- Posts: 3655
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 12:37 am
- Location: Robbing the cradle.
Re: David Belle
Anyone else suddenly have a craving for sausage? No?
-
Renegade_Turner
- Gramps
- Posts: 6942
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am
Re: David Belle
Conflict? What's he on about? That was weird.