Ah..come on now really..if everyone went around taking things with their own definitions, what would be the point in things like logical debates?
How do you expect people to take you seriously if you come up with incorrect definitions that you'd like to believe are true?
Say I decide to have my own definition of something like, say, "The Nazi Party", and define it as a group of very nice people who just wanted to make the world a better place?
What if we all decided to start making up our own definitions for words? Words would lose their real meaning, people would become incapable of communicating properly without extreme confusion, and the English language would be effectively fucked up.
But..that aside, I guess it's okay to come up with your own definitions for words, even if you are
BLATANTLY WRONG.
Colicedus wrote:I just don't believe in following a book made by Cults like Catholicism.
Does this not show he's presenting it as a fact that Catholicism is a cult? Come on now, seriously, why keep arguing a lost cause? He was wrong..