Lets be in the guinness book of world records 2010

Anything else
User avatar
tokage
Posts: 615
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 12:24 pm
Location: In a meat machine

Re: Lets be in the guinness book of world records 2010

Post by tokage » Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:55 am

Well in retrospect I should have worded my criticism a lot better, no wonder it was misunderstood.
Fournine wrote:Tokage - what the hell is your avatar, anyway?
A recursively generated covering by boxes of random size and color of a rectangular area. I could say it is a reference to the knapsack problem, but that would be cheating. Actually there is no purpose.

User avatar
h2ostra
Posts: 197
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 4:42 pm
Location: Davis, CA

Re: Lets be in the guinness book of world records 2010

Post by h2ostra » Fri Jan 08, 2010 5:10 am

In all of this arguing, I think we are forgetting who is winning here: Devilsclub

Damn, he beat me too.

User avatar
TheBigCheese
Posts: 856
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 11:01 am
Location: Lost in the Alps.

Re: Lets be in the guinness book of world records 2010

Post by TheBigCheese » Fri Jan 08, 2010 5:52 pm

Fournine wrote:Actually, that point was also refuted.
If we crush the y-axis down, for example, Grayswandir ends up being a lot closer to Renegade_Turner than to Blorx. As one axis becomes de-emphasized relative to the other, the closeness between points shift accordingly.
In other words, as we put less value on the number of posts and more value on the age of membership, Renegade_Turner and Grayswandir become nearly identical and Blorx's higher age becomes more significant of a difference.
I meant by relative that no two points can swap places, being closer to the center. If one is farther away than the other, it will always be, though it may be accentuated or diminished.

User avatar
tokage
Posts: 615
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 12:24 pm
Location: In a meat machine

Re: Lets be in the guinness book of world records 2010

Post by tokage » Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:16 pm

TheBigCheese wrote: I meant by relative that no two points can swap places, being closer to the center. If one is farther away than the other, it will always be, though it may be accentuated or diminished.
Sorry, that's not true. You have two total orders ordering the people, once after posts and once after time. Those orders won't change, that is true. And someone who has less posts and less time will always be closer to the center. But if two people are ordered differently by posts and time, e.g. one has more posts and one has more days, how they will rank on the combined order (distance from the origin) will depend on how you weigh posts and time. The most extreme case is, if you just weigh one of the properties with 0 (in effect ignoring it for the combined order) and giving the other a weight >0, then the order of the other property will totally take over.

User avatar
Devilsclub
Posts: 537
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 8:43 am
Location: Wolfire Forum, User Control Panel :P

Re: Lets be in the guinness book of world records 2010

Post by Devilsclub » Sat Jan 09, 2010 9:32 am

h2ostra wrote:In all of this arguing, I think we are forgetting who is winning here: Devilsclub

Damn, he beat me too.
I agree watching you guys argue is funny :lol:

and i have lowered my posts and i do know that since i came back only 3 topics or so have been opened.

As i see it, Im not a spammer :roll:

User avatar
Devilsclub
Posts: 537
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 8:43 am
Location: Wolfire Forum, User Control Panel :P

Re: Lets be in the guinness book of world records 2010

Post by Devilsclub » Sat Jan 09, 2010 9:32 am

Oh and to be truthful, evem im amazed at the speed this topic got 7 pages lol

User avatar
Glabbit
Posts: 4917
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:38 am
Location: A mile away, with your shoes!

Re: Lets be in the guinness book of world records 2010

Post by Glabbit » Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:50 pm

"As I see it, I'm not a spammer"
*doubleposts*


Olololololololololol.

RobLikesBrunch
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:24 am

Re: Lets be in the guinness book of world records 2010

Post by RobLikesBrunch » Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:06 pm

But I am utterly certain that the document I handed you didn't contain that! I have no idea what you're talking about!

But Mr. Fullinger, you can't do that! It's immoral! What--?

NO! I SWEAR! I didn't put it in there!

MR. FULLINGE--

User avatar
TheBigCheese
Posts: 856
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 11:01 am
Location: Lost in the Alps.

Re: Lets be in the guinness book of world records 2010

Post by TheBigCheese » Sat Jan 09, 2010 10:24 pm

tokage wrote:
TheBigCheese wrote: I meant by relative that no two points can swap places, being closer to the center. If one is farther away than the other, it will always be, though it may be accentuated or diminished.
Sorry, that's not true. You have two total orders ordering the people, once after posts and once after time. Those orders won't change, that is true. And someone who has less posts and less time will always be closer to the center. But if two people are ordered differently by posts and time, e.g. one has more posts and one has more days, how they will rank on the combined order (distance from the origin) will depend on how you weigh posts and time. The most extreme case is, if you just weigh one of the properties with 0 (in effect ignoring it for the combined order) and giving the other a weight >0, then the order of the other property will totally take over.
Yeah... don't know what I was thinking on that one. :?

User avatar
Devilsclub
Posts: 537
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 8:43 am
Location: Wolfire Forum, User Control Panel :P

Re: Lets be in the guinness book of world records 2010

Post by Devilsclub » Sun Jan 10, 2010 10:58 am

Keep posting :roll:

morons :roll: no offence o.o

User avatar
Glabbit
Posts: 4917
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:38 am
Location: A mile away, with your shoes!

Re: Lets be in the guinness book of world records 2010

Post by Glabbit » Sun Jan 10, 2010 11:24 am

So, if the plan is to create the longest thread containing all sorts of spam, why don't we simply continue with the randomness thread? It's what it's for!

User avatar
shadow717
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:28 am
Location: Hunting down Andy.
Contact:

Re: Lets be in the guinness book of world records 2010

Post by shadow717 » Sun Jan 10, 2010 2:52 pm

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?v=i ... 1266275103

This character is the only Indian member of the Wolfire games group on facebook. This leads me to believe that it's Devilsclub. Coincidentally I also found fournine in that group along with some other people from the forum.

User avatar
Renegade_Turner
Gramps
Posts: 6942
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:59 am

Re: Lets be in the guinness book of world records 2010

Post by Renegade_Turner » Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:29 pm

I wonder if this guy is actually retarded or if it's just something lost in translation that makes him seem retarded. I think it's the former, and I've never been wrong about anything in the past.

User avatar
Armored Wolf
Posts: 1267
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:35 am
Location: In Renegade_Turner's brain

Re: Lets be in the guinness book of world records 2010

Post by Armored Wolf » Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:46 pm

Renegade_Turner wrote: ...and I've never been wrong about anything in the past.
A bold claim.

-searches the forums for an instance where you're wrong-

Ahem. One minute please.

-continues increasingly frantic search-

It appears you have the facts on your side. Dang, on other forums I have always been able to prove they are, in fact, wrong in at least one instance.

User avatar
Glabbit
Posts: 4917
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:38 am
Location: A mile away, with your shoes!

Re: Lets be in the guinness book of world records 2010

Post by Glabbit » Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:39 am

Try harder!

Post Reply