Wolfire Games Forums

I was having it on the brink of derailment trying to generalize the topic after Wilbefast showed an opening. Unluckily Endoperez brought it back on track.

But don't fear it won't be long.

Renegade_Turner wrote:Are you content with your monstrous thighs?

I would if i had them

I'll go get some protein shake ...

tokage wrote:I was having it on the brink of derailment trying to generalize the topic after Wilbefast showed an opening. Unluckily Endoperez brought it back on track.

But don't fear it won't be long.

Haha yeah the conversation went from one about morality in games to one about the general definitions of morality and ethics. I was considering playing devil's advocate and mentioning the change in thread topic to further throw it off topic, but I decided I'd be considerate for once because I was enjoying the debate. It was interesting. If something doesn't interest me, I usually just derail it.

wrong thread

Assaultman67 wrote:wrong thread

Haha, you actually enjoy the attention?

tokage wrote:

Assaultman67 wrote:wrong thread

Haha, you actually enjoy the attention?

I got confused about the transition ...

endoperez didn't post here ... and you guys are talking about the morality in games ... so im like ... "???"

meh ... ive been avoiding that thread ...

I probably should catch up and try to contribute .. but i get the feeling that anything said there has been said before :/ ...

i dont do many boring things, im too awesome

Renegade_Turner wrote:As if you've ever said something completely original that hasn't ever been said before in some way. I guess you should just never post again, it's futile.

What you just said has been said before ...

so thanks for demonstrating my point ...

We all stand on the shoulder of giants.

Come on, that is common sense since centuries and gets particularly more important now that copying things became as easy as pressing a button.
Also it is not about if what you said has been said before, it is more about if your audience has heard it before in that particular context. You are just trying to be stupid...

Assaultman67 wrote:

Renegade_Turner wrote:As if you've ever said something completely original that hasn't ever been said before in some way. I guess you should just never post again, it's futile.

What you just said has been said before ...

so thanks for demonstrating my point ...

tokage wrote:Come on, that is common sense since centuries and gets particularly more important now that copying things became as easy as pressing a button.
Also it is not about if what you said has been said before, it is more about if your audience has heard it before in that particular context. You are just trying to be stupid...

I couldn't have quite said it better myself.

But really, thank you, Assaultman67, for validating my theory that you're probably nothing more than a big starchy potatoe with two arms, two legs and a head.

I mean, really, can you understand the futility of your point? That's about as useful as saying "Life is meaningless, I'm giving up." For god sake man have a little self respect. Or go find some if you don't have any.

Besides, what WAS your point to begin with? Let's recap.

Assaultman67 wrote:meh ... ive been avoiding that thread ...

I probably should catch up and try to contribute .. but i get the feeling that anything said there has been said before :/ ...

Your point was that you shouldn't bother posting something if it hasn't already been said by someone somewhere in the world at some point in history.

So how did me saying something that had been said by someone before prove your point? You didn't demonstrate the uselessness of what I said or disprove the usefullness of what I said. That would be the only way that I could have "proved your point", if there even is a point to be found from your flabbergasting, ill-informed and ill-conceived sequence of intellectual fuck-ups