Receiver Graphical Performance
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 6:31 am
Receiver Graphical Performance
Are performance improvements planned? Because I feel like the game runs worse than it should on my machine. It's no super computer but I figured it should be able to run something as simple looking as Receiver without any frame drops.
My specs:
i5-2320 3.00GHz
Asus GTX560ti DCU2 1GB
8GB RAM
Even on the lowest graphical option it still regularly dips into the 30s running at 1080p.
The frame drops don't really affect gameplay all that much but I was just curious how it ran for every one else.
My specs:
i5-2320 3.00GHz
Asus GTX560ti DCU2 1GB
8GB RAM
Even on the lowest graphical option it still regularly dips into the 30s running at 1080p.
The frame drops don't really affect gameplay all that much but I was just curious how it ran for every one else.
Re: Receiver Graphical Performance
Yeah it works like crap
Re: Receiver Graphical Performance
It's half because of Unity. Unity isn't exactly the most fantastic engine when it comes to performance.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:13 am
Re: Receiver Graphical Performance
Yeah, i have a high end PC, yet it lags quite alot for me sometimes.
Normally, when i restart my computer it helps.
Also try running on Fastest setting, its not much different from Fantastic...
Normally, when i restart my computer it helps.
Also try running on Fastest setting, its not much different from Fantastic...
Re: Receiver Graphical Performance
it's mostly due to Unity's bastard business model, where occlusion culling (which is essential for any reasonable 3d game) is disabled unless you pay for the Pro version
Re: Receiver Graphical Performance
That can't be the reason. Unless I'm mistaken, the pro version is needed to add shadows. Since there are shadows, Receiver must be built on the pro version.bgr wrote:it's mostly due to Unity's bastard business model, where occlusion culling (which is essential for any reasonable 3d game) is disabled unless you pay for the Pro version
That said, who knows what kind of optimizations they had time to implement. I expect they will continue to add some improvements. Currently, the game is over demanding.
Re: Receiver Graphical Performance
hmm, yeah, I forgot about the shadows, I usually play on lower settings. It'd be cool if we could get some official word on this, what's their plan and all
Re: Receiver Graphical Performance
Another post brought this link up. The future looks bright:
https://github.com/David20321/7DFPS/blo ... d-TODO.txtHard:
- background loading of new tiles
- occlusion culling
Re: Receiver Graphical Performance
i got a framerate of 10 or lower when i play this game but i can ru n the highest games like bf3 and stuf...whats up with that?
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 2:41 am
Re: Receiver Graphical Performance
I would assume this is because it hasn't been optimized, as it wasn't in development very long.
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:52 am
- Location: Australia, where the timezone is GMT+10/11
- Contact:
Re: Receiver Graphical Performance
I took the source and compiled it myself a few weeks ago.
Pre-built binaries: ~10 FPS, constant stuttering
Compiled from unity files: 60+ FPS, extremely smooth, even towards the upper graphic levels
Not sure if it'll work for everyone, but it seems to have worked for me.
Pre-built binaries: ~10 FPS, constant stuttering
Compiled from unity files: 60+ FPS, extremely smooth, even towards the upper graphic levels
Not sure if it'll work for everyone, but it seems to have worked for me.