Page 2 of 4
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:43 pm
So what? they spam the Forum and then there is 11 posts to delete rather than just the one?
Actually It could work.
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:50 pm
It could work, though usually there's one spam topic per spammer, so a minimal post count of about 2 would work.
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:56 pm
I think five...
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:04 pm
Perhaps, but you never see them post twice.
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:19 pm
True... in that case, do you think we should delete there Accounts?
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:21 pm
I'm pretty sure only Jeff and David can do that, since they're administrators.
If it's necessary, we should leave that to them, too.
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:28 pm
that doesn't prevent the thread to begin with
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:41 pm
No, it doesn't. IMO it's unnecessary.
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:59 pm
Hmm... maybe limit topic creation to 3 posts as well?
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:03 pm
That's another good idea IMO.
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 4:55 am
But that wouldn't bring much new users to this place.
Joining this forum is very often connected to making a new thread, like "David, I paid like 5 minutes ago, isn't it time to give me the serial number?"
The link thing is good though.
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 7:23 pm
But not having quite so many of those topics so quickly would be a good thing, wouldn't it?
Either way, the link thing would definitely be pretty good.
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 8:41 pm
I'm on the forums all the time
and I hate spam more than my custom title
, so... ME! I've always wanted to be a moderator
Edit: Oh yah... and I check the forums constantly, because I'm always on the internet
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 11:05 pm
Whoa, I seriously did not expect that many people getting picked as new moderators. Man I wish I had posted earlier, is it too late to ask now?
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 11:08 pm
Yeah, it seems a bit careless, but we're all good folks, so it seems appropriate, I guess.