Look at the comments on the Haphead video!

[Phoenixwarrior141]

Oh you screwed the pooch guys.

17 minutes ago the new video released, and already one comment is calling you a "Furry SJW" and someone else isn't buying the game until speed kicks up.

You. Fucked. Up.

[Korban3]

link or gtfo

[akazi]

link or gtfo

https://twitter.com/Akazi1994/status/537843640312541184

[Korban3]

I don't think David plans on giving up on Overgrowth because a couple of Youtube commenters, some of the lowest scum on the internet, give him shit. He's had literally years of people trolling Overgrowth.

[Phoenixwarrior141]

Is it trolling when the words are true though?

[Korban3]

Who cares if David is a furry SJW? His game is fucking awesome.

People care too much about labels these days. Bullets, on the other hand, don't discriminate.

[EPR89]

Oh you screwed the pooch guys.

17 minutes ago the new video released, and already one comment is calling you a "Furry SJW" and someone else isn't buying the game until speed kicks up.

You. Fucked. Up.

More like, those guys are pieces of shit who get a hate boner for calling people SJW and a bunch of other stuff that doesn't really apply.
Matches up nicely with everything David said against Gamer Gate. Very nice of those people to prove him right again and again, especially considering that the comments on the Haphead video had to be removed, together with their bile.

[Phoenixwarrior141]

If it was GG in force that video would be taken down already be taken down.

Anyways, until someone can get me a specific link to what David said, I'm agreeing with the GamerGaters. Going out against GG has never ended well for anyone, David is smart enough to know this.

[Endoperez]

If it was GG in force that video would be taken down already be taken down.

Anyways, until someone can get me a specific link to what David said, I'm agreeing with the GamerGaters. Going out against GG has never ended well for anyone, David is smart enough to know this.

"You cannot reason a man out of a position he has not reasoned himself into."

You ask us for proof, but believe a stance without having any of your own?

If you say that something we provide as proof is not good enough, there's nothing more we can do.
You are the one who decides what is right or wrong, real or fiction.
You are the one who decides if you, yourself, are right.
That way lie delusions of self-grandeur.

[Phoenixwarrior141]

The burden of proof is on the defender to prove they did nothing wrong, not the offender to prove the same thing.

I'm not going to take the word of a rather biased community. Even GG doesn't call every non-GGer an SJW, only people vocally anti-GG.

[EPR89]

The burden of proof is on the defender to prove they did nothing wrong, not the offender to prove the same thing.

That's not how presumption of innocence works.

Your way of dealing with the burden of proof reminds me of witch trials and the inquisition. With that mode of operation everyone could just go around accusing people of any outrageous thing.
And that's exactly why it's the other way round.

[Phoenixwarrior141]

Big difference, here's there's evidence to the contrary of what I'm saying.

If you can't be bothered to prove your innocence, why should I perceive you are?

I'll continue to believe (the more rational) gamergaters until I have proof to the contrary of what they're saying.

[Endoperez]

I'm not going to take the word of a rather biased community.

That is just proving my point.
Our word isn't enough if you decide so, because "we have bias"...

If I give an example of strong bullying, it's not good enough because "it's a troll".
If I give example of harassment, from several people active in gamergate, it doesn't count because they had a reason.
If I give an example of gamergaters attacking someone, it doesn't count because the attack failed.

Nothing I say, sticks. It feels pointless. I've tried to stop arguing with you, but it's hard, when half the time the thing you post are so simply wrong. Literally simply. It seems like if I just point out this single thing, then you'll go "AHA, I get your point!"... and we could find some common ground... but it never seems to happen.

Like here. You basically said that Gamergate can destroy Wolfire's Youtube channel and that anyone who goes against Gamergate will suffer... which is harassment, bullying, fearmongering. A BAD THING. Yes, many people who talk against Gamergate will suffer for it, and that is why Gamergate is in the wrong and why I speak against Gamergate.

You are a stormtrooper, one of the many in Gamergate's uniform and rather innocent in the grand scheme of things. The only reasons I oppose you is the direction your gun is aimed at, and the guys with skulls and black clothes who lead you.

[Phoenixwarrior141]

You are all vastly anti-GamerGate

You all support Wolfire no matter what they do

You all have shown clear bias against things anti-Wolfire and pro-GamerGate in the past. This post distracting people from the vast majority of people who want Wolfire to finish the damn game, and don't like them being anti-GamerGate.

Yes, I'd rather take the less of two evils until evidence is shown. Considering people have LINKED TO THE TWITTER ACCOUNT before, this shouldn't be a problem.

[EPR89]

You could look it up yourself...
You know, make sure that you don't get your information from biased sources and all that shit.

Then again, you basing one of your posts on anything but your own opinion would probably already be a step in the right direction.