Do we need moderators?

[Untadaike]

I agree with Renegade's post actually

?!

[Armored Wolf]

I agree with Renegade's post actually

?!

...?

[Renegade_Turner]

It shouldn't shock you that people agree with me. I'm more intelligent than you, after all.

[Armored Wolf]

It shouldn't shock you that people agree with me. I'm more intelligent than you, after all.

I sure hope you are talking to Untadaike.

[Renegade_Turner]

I was, actually. I'm probably more intelligent than you too, though. No offense, I'm just intense.

[Assaultman67]

Never thought i would say this but ...

Thank god intelligent people are less likely to breed

[Renegade_Turner]

Since when?

In fact, intelligent, educated and, above all, wealthy people are MORE likely to have children.

[Endoperez]

I was, actually. I'm probably more intelligent than you too, though. No offense, I'm just intense.

Your future employers can connect your real name and face to this account. I wouldn't hire you. That's not intelligent or intense, now is it?

Since when?

In fact, intelligent, educated and, above all, wealthy people are MORE likely to have children.

And that's just stupid. Well-educated and intelligent people use contraceptives, there's less teenage pregnancies and a teen pregnancy that results in a child means harder time getting a high-level education (also for the father if he wants to economically support his family), children are expensive to raise so having children decreases your wealth etc etc.

Here's a related study:

http://www.cso.ie/releasespublications/ ... genpov.pdf
The household size during teenage years also appears to have had an impact on the experience of poverty in adulthood. Almost 23% of persons aged 25-65 who lived with 7 or more siblings as a teenager were at risk of poverty in 2005, compared to 14.6% of those who lived with less than 3 siblings. Persons from larger households also had a higher consistent poverty rate of 8.4%, compared to 5.8% for persons who lived with less than 3 siblings.

[Renegade_Turner]

I was, actually. I'm probably more intelligent than you too, though. No offense, I'm just intense.

Your future employers can connect your real name and face to this account. I wouldn't hire you. That's not intelligent or intense, now is it?[/i]

No, they couldn't. How so?

[Endoperez]

No, they couldn't. How so?

You are linking to a myspace page of a certain A.H., with location listed as Waterford, the same one you list as your location here in the forums.

[Armored Wolf]

I was, actually. I'm probably more intelligent than you too, though. No offense, I'm just intense.

Depends on your definition of "intelligence". But anyway...

[TheBigCheese]

It's amazing what you can find with a little websleuthing.

For instance, you were the lead singer in a band of five of your friends back in 2006. I could probably find more, as just finding that fact instantly gave me 3 or 4 more information leads.

But really, you can't find anything on me, I'm almost nearly invisible, other than maybe getting my name if you get lucky.

[Renegade_Turner]

For instance, you were the lead singer in a band of five of your friends back in 2006. I could probably find more, as just finding that fact instantly gave me 3 or 4 more information leads.

Eh? I was never in a band, ever...

You are linking to a myspace page of a certain A.H., with location listed as Waterford, the same one you list as your location here in the forums.

I did? When?

[Assaultman67]

Your name is *Censored* apparently

[tokage]

You are linking to a myspace page of a certain A.H., with location listed as Waterford, the same one you list as your location here in the forums.

I did? When?

In your profile and on the icon under your avatar.