Wolfire Games Forums

Wilbefast wrote:I agree with Renegade's post actually

?!

Untadaike wrote:

Wilbefast wrote:I agree with Renegade's post actually

?!

...?

Renegade_Turner wrote:It shouldn't shock you that people agree with me. I'm more intelligent than you, after all.

I sure hope you are talking to Untadaike.

Renegade_Turner wrote:I was, actually. I'm probably more intelligent than you too, though. No offense, I'm just intense.

Your future employers can connect your real name and face to this account. I wouldn't hire you. That's not intelligent or intense, now is it?

Renegade_Turner wrote:Since when?

In fact, intelligent, educated and, above all, wealthy people are MORE likely to have children.

And that's just stupid. Well-educated and intelligent people use contraceptives, there's less teenage pregnancies and a teen pregnancy that results in a child means harder time getting a high-level education (also for the father if he wants to economically support his family), children are expensive to raise so having children decreases your wealth etc etc.

Here's a related study:

http://www.cso.ie/releasespublications/ ... genpov.pdf
The household size during teenage years also appears to have had an impact on the experience of poverty in adulthood. Almost 23% of persons aged 25-65 who lived with 7 or more siblings as a teenager were at risk of poverty in 2005, compared to 14.6% of those who lived with less than 3 siblings. Persons from larger households also had a higher consistent poverty rate of 8.4%, compared to 5.8% for persons who lived with less than 3 siblings.

Endoperez wrote:

Renegade_Turner wrote:I was, actually. I'm probably more intelligent than you too, though. No offense, I'm just intense.

Your future employers can connect your real name and face to this account. I wouldn't hire you. That's not intelligent or intense, now is it?[/i]

No, they couldn't. How so?

Renegade_Turner wrote:No, they couldn't. How so?

You are linking to a myspace page of a certain A.H., with location listed as Waterford, the same one you list as your location here in the forums.

Renegade_Turner wrote:I was, actually. I'm probably more intelligent than you too, though. No offense, I'm just intense.

Depends on your definition of "intelligence". But anyway...

It's amazing what you can find with a little websleuthing.

For instance, you were the lead singer in a band of five of your friends back in 2006. I could probably find more, as just finding that fact instantly gave me 3 or 4 more information leads.

But really, you can't find anything on me, I'm almost nearly invisible, other than maybe getting my name if you get lucky.

TheBigCheese wrote:For instance, you were the lead singer in a band of five of your friends back in 2006. I could probably find more, as just finding that fact instantly gave me 3 or 4 more information leads.

Eh? I was never in a band, ever...

Endoperez wrote:You are linking to a myspace page of a certain A.H., with location listed as Waterford, the same one you list as your location here in the forums.

I did? When?

Renegade_Turner wrote:

Endoperez wrote:You are linking to a myspace page of a certain A.H., with location listed as Waterford, the same one you list as your location here in the forums.

I did? When?

In your profile and on the icon under your avatar.